Gary R. Meyer, Relator, vs. George F. Cook Construction Company, and State Fund Mutual Insurance Company, Respondents, and Gresser Concrete, and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Respondents, and Stellar Concrete & Masonry, and Lumbermen's Underwriting Alliance, Respondents.

Annotate this Case
Gary R. Meyer, Relator, vs. George F. Cook Construction Company, and State Fund Mutual Insurance Company, Respondents, and Gresser Concrete, and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Respondents, and Stellar Concrete & Masonry, and Lumbermen's Underwriting Alliance, Respondents. A05-1475, Supreme Court Order, November 3, 2005.

STATE OF MINNESOTA

IN SUPREME COURT

A05-1475

 

 

Gary R. Meyer,

                        Relator,

 

vs.
George F. Cook Construction Company,
and State Fund Mutual Insurance Company,

 

                                                Respondents,

 

and

 

Gresser Concrete, and Liberty Mutual

Insurance Company,

 

                                                Respondents,

 

and

 

Stellar Concrete & Masonry, and

Lumbermen's Underwriting Alliance,

 

                                                Respondents.

 

            Considered and decided by the court en banc.

 

O R D E R

 

            Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

            IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers' Compensation Court of Appeals filed June 27, 2005, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion.  See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn. 1982) (summary dispositions have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view, doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

            Dated:  October 31, 2005

                                                                                    BY THE COURT:

 

           

 

    /s/                                                          

 

Kathleen A. Blatz
             Chief Justice

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.