Bryan Hodgson, deceased, by Lynn Hodgson, Respondent, vs. Al's Tree Service, Uninsured, and Special Compensation Fund, Relator (A04-1829), and Linda Hanenburg, on behalf of Leah Hanenburg, Relators (A04-1865).

Annotate this Case
Bryan Hodgson, deceased, by Lynn Hodgson, Respondent, vs. Al's Tree Service, Uninsured, and Special Compensation Fund, Relator (A04-1829), and Linda Hanenburg, on behalf of Leah Hanenburg, Relators (A04-1865). A04-1829, A04-1865, Supreme Court Order, February 17, 2005.

STATE OF MINNESOTA

IN SUPREME COURT

A04-1829 and A04-1865

 

 

Bryan Hodgson, deceased, by

Lynn Hodgson,

 

                        Respondent,

 

vs.

 

Al's Tree Service,

Uninsured,

 

and

 

Special Compensation Fund,

 

                        Relator (A04-1829),

 

and

 

Linda Hanenburg, on behalf of

Leah Hanenburg,

 

                                    Relators (A04-1865).

 

 

            Considered and decided by the court en banc.

 

 

O R D E R

 

            Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

            IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers' Compensation Court of Appeals filed September 8, 2004, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion.  See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn. 1982) (summary dispositions have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view, doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

            Employee is awarded $1,200 in attorney fees.

            Dated:  February 15, 2005

 

 

                                                                                    BY THE COURT:

                                               

 

 

                                                                                        /s/                                                    


                                                                                    Helen M. Meyer

Associate Justice

 

 

 


    /s/                                                          

 

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.