Clara Wensman, Respondent, vs. Order of St. Benedict/St. John's University, Self-Insured, and BRAC, Administrator, Relators, and Center for Diagnostic Imaging, St. Cloud Orthopedics, and Medicare, Intervenors.

Annotate this Case
Clara Wensman, Respondent, vs. Order of St. Benedict/St. John's University, Self-Insured, and BRAC, Administrator, Relators, and Center for Diagnostic Imaging, St. Cloud Orthopedics, and Medicare, Intervenors. A04-1463, Supreme Court Order, November 4, 2004.

STATE OF MINNESOTA

 

IN SUPREME COURT

 

A04-1463

 

 

Clara Wensman,

 

                        Respondent,

 

vs.

 

Order of St. Benedict/St. John's University,

Self-Insured, and BRAC, Administrator,

 

                                                Relators,

 

and

 

Center for Diagnostic Imaging,

St. Cloud Orthopedics, and

Medicare,

 

                                                Intervenors.

 

 

            Considered and decided by the court en banc.

 

 

O R D E R

 

 

            Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

            IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers' Compensation Court of Appeals filed July 14, 2004, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion.  See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn. 1982) (summary dispositions have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view, doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

            Employee is awarded $1,200 in attorney fees.

            Dated:  October 27, 2004

 

                                                                                    BY THE COURT:

                                               

 

 

                                                                                        /s/                                                          


                                                                                    Helen M. Meyer

Associate Justice

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.