Mark Dimon, Respondent, vs. Metz Baking and Sentry Claims Services, Relators, and Twin Cities Bakery Drivers Health & Welfare Fund and Team Care of Minnesota, P.C., Intervenors.

Annotate this Case
Mark Dimon, Respondent, vs. Metz Baking and Sentry Claims Services, Relators, and Twin Cities Bakery Drivers Health & Welfare Fund and Team Care of Minnesota, P.C., Intervenors. A03-1694, Supreme Court Order, February 5, 2004.

STATE OF MINNESOTA

 

IN SUPREME COURT

 

A03-1694

 

Mark Dimon,

 

                                    Respondent,

 

vs.

 

Metz Baking and Sentry Claims Services,

 

                                    Relators,

 

and

 

Twin Cities Bakery Drivers Health & Welfare

Fund and Team Care of Minnesota, P.C.,

 

                                    Intervenors.

 

 

O R D E R

 

            Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

            IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers' Compensation Court of Appeals filed October 7, 2003, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion.  See Minn. R. Civ. App. P. 136.01.

            Employee is awarded $1,200 in attorney fees.

Dated:    January 29, 2004

                                                                                    BY THE COURT:

                                               

 

 

    /s/Helen Meyer

                                                                                    Associate Justice

 

 

 

 

 

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.