In re Petition for Disciplinary Action against Stuart E. Gale, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 33054.

Annotate this Case
In re Petition for Disciplinary Action against Stuart E. Gale, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 33054. A03-58, Supreme Court Order, February 5, 2004.

STATE OF MINNESOTA

 

IN SUPREME COURT

A03-58

 

 

In re Petition for Disciplinary Action against

Stuart E. Gale, a Minnesota Attorney,

Registration No. 33054.

 

 

O R D E R

 

 

            The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility has filed a petition for disciplinary action alleging that respondent Stuart E. Gale has committed professional misconduct warranting public discipline, namely, respondent improperly notarized the signature of his daughter-in-law on a mortgage document based upon his son's representation that she had authorized him to sign on her behalf.  This conduct violated Minn. R. Prof. Conduct 8.4(c).

            Respondent admits his conduct violated the Rules of Professional Conduct, waives his rights under Rule 14, Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility (RLPR), and has entered into a stipulation with the Director in which they jointly recommend that the appropriate discipline is a public reprimand and a 30-day suspension, stayed for two years, and payment of $900 in costs and $757 in disbursements under Rule 24, RLPR.

            This court has independently reviewed the file and approves the jointly recommended disposition.

            Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

            IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that respondent Gale E. Stuart is publicly reprimanded and suspended for 30 days stayed upon the condition that respondent not engage in similar misconduct or otherwise violate the Minnesota Rules of Professional Conduct for two years from the date of this order.  Respondent shall pay $900 in costs and $757 in disbursements under Rule 24, RLPR.

            Dated:   January 28, 2004

                                                                                    BY THE COURT:

 

                         /s/ Paul H. Anderson  

                                                                                      Associate Justice

 

            BLATZ, C.J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

 

 

 

 

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.