List of ORDERS ON PETITIONS FOR FURTHER REVIEW FILED April 15, 2003

Annotate this Case
ORDERS ON PETITIONS FOR FURTHER REVIEW FILED April 15, 2003 Minnesota Supreme Court
ORDERS ON PETITIONS FOR FURTHER REVIEW FILED
April 15, 2003

1. State v. Derek John Marah C7-02-456 Denied 2. Terence Jerome Wilson v. State C4-02-1029 Denied 3. Joe "Kim" Clingan v. Anoka County, et al. CX-02-1049 Denied 4. State v. Paulla Ann McLellan C4-02-723 Denied 5. State v. Lawrence Charles Anderson C2-01-1777 Denied 6. State v. Todd Jeffrey Askerooth C6-02-318 Granted 7. State v. Jeffrey Charles Morris C8-02-434 Denied 8. Ikechi Kallys Albert v. Misti R. Allen Binsfeld, et al. C1-02-632 Denied 9. Edward Kraemer & Sons, Inc. v. Douglas Township C0-02-2176 - Denied 10. State v. Douglas Wayne Young C9-01-1968 Denied 11. State v. Nicole Star Dunn CX-02-872 Denied 12. State v. Jarred Dean Lind CX-02-239 Granted/Reversed/Remanded 13. State v. John Patrick Graham C1-02-887 Denied 14. State v. Thomas Ray Jackson C6-02-335 Denied 15. State v. John Paul Ackerman C7-02-828 Denied 16. Edward J. Anderson v. Anoka Hennepin Independent School District 11 and Paul Peterson C0-02-1125 Granted 17. ITiesha Engle, et al. v. Continental Casualty Company C9-02-1088 Denied 18. City Pages, a publication of City Pages Media, Inc., et al. v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Minnesota C2-02-1191 Denied 19. Scotty Iverson Floyd v. State C3-02-311 Denied 20. In the Matter of the Welfare of:  A.J.F. C1-02-663 Denied 21. Guy W. Wicklander v. James Rarick, et al. C5-02-1217 Denied 22. Thomas D. Ryan v. ColorSpan Corporation, et al. C0-02-699 Denied 23. State v. Kerry Dean Stevenson C0-02-735 Denied 24. In the Matter of the Children of:  L.R., W.R. and A.H., Sr., Parents C3-02-1281 - Denied 25. In the Matter of the Child of:  P.T. and A.T., Parents C5-02-1508 Denied 26. In re the Marriage of:  Lana Susan Higgins v. Warren Nau Higgins, Jr. - C7-02-1056 - Dismissed 27. Victoria Anne and John DeSanti v. David John and James Kraemer, d/b/a The Barn C8-02-1311 Dismissed

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.