List of ORDERS ON PETITIONS FOR FURTHER REVIEW FILED September 25, 2002

Annotate this Case
ORDERS ON PETITIONS FOR FURTHER REVIEW FILED September 25, 2002 Minnesota Supreme Court
ORDERS ON PETITIONS FOR FURTHER REVIEW FILED
September 25, 2002

1. State v. Marcus Orlando Glass C4-01-1652 Denied 2. State v. Jela DeShaun Jones CX-01-1431 Granted 3. In re the Marriage of: Jean-Marie Baudhuin v. David J. Baudhuin C7-01-1564 - Denied 4. In re Petitions of I&M Rail Link, LLC C7-02-1249, C3-02-1250 and C5-02-1251 Denied 5. Bonifacio Ayala, Jr. v. State C6-01-1992 Denied 6. Mortgage One, Inc. (Assignee and Successor in Interest to Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc.) v. Michelle R. Newton, a/k/a Michelle R. Newton-Witkowski, John Doe, et al., Theodore Witkowski C1-02-16 Denied 7. In re: Andrew Ross Topliff v. Heather Warne Piehl C0-02-234 Denied 8. Michael Gorman v. State C2-01-2170 Denied 9. State v. Jerry Wayne Gedney C9-01-1789 Denied 10. State v. Donald J. Fisch C2-02-557 Denied 11. Jack A. Elder v. La Crescent Township, et al. C0-01-2197 Denied 12. State v. Mark Ajaak Cham C7-01-1628 Denied 13. Keith Allen Lind v. State C5-01-2017 Denied 14. Northern States Power Co., d/b/a Xcel Energy v. City of Mendota Heights and Power Line Task Force, Inc. C3-02-65 Denied 15. State v. Frederick Arden Hamilton C2-02-381 Denied 16. Fithi Chernet Asfaha v. State C6-02-691 Granted 17. State v. Rodney Anthony Brooks C8-01-1931 Denied 18. Mulugeta Gebremeskel v. University of Minnesota C9-02-183 Denied 19. State v. John Mark Colosimo C7-01-2181 Granted 20. Clifford H. Lambert, et al. v. Harry E. Bongard, et al. C2-01-1990 Denied 21. DJD Partners, VII, LLC v. Finest Foodservices, a Delaware limited liability company, CNL Income Fund XVIII, Ltd., a Florida limited partnership - C7-01-2245 Denied 22. Investment Management, Inc., et al. v. Jordan Realty, Inc., et al., Patricia Jordan, PBR Partnership, et al., C.R. Development LLP, et al. C3-01-2162 Denied 23. State v. Carl James Jarvis C2-01-1097 Granted 24. Joseph Dixon v. City of Minneapolis C6-02-948 Denied

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.