In re Petition for Disciplinary Action against Richard D. Varriano, an Attorney at Law of the State of Minnesota.

Annotate this Case
In re Petition for Disciplinary Action against Richard D. Varriano, an Attorney at Law of the State of Minnesota. C9-02-1947, Supreme Court Order, December 26, 2002.

STATE OF MINNESOTA

 

IN SUPREME COURT

C9-02-1947

 

 

In re Petition for Disciplinary Action against

Richard D. Varriano, an Attorney at Law of

the State of Minnesota.

 

 

O R D E R

 

 

            The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility has filed a petition for disciplinary action alleging that respondent, Richard D. Varriano, has committed professional misconduct warranting public discipline, namely, failing to comply with applicable federal statutes, rules and regulations, failing to abide by a court's order, and failing to diligently represent his client, all of which resulted in respondent being reprimanded and sanctioned by the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit.  The Director alleged in the petition that respondent's conduct violated Minn. R. Prof. Conduct 1.3, 3.4(c), and 8.4(d). 

            Respondent admits his conduct violated the Rules of Professional Conduct, waives his rights under Rule 14, Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility, and has entered into a stipulation with the Director in which they jointly recommend that the appropriate discipline is a public reprimand and payment of $900 in costs and disbursements under Rule 24, Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility.

            This court has independently reviewed the file and approves the jointly recommended disposition.

 

            IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that respondent, Richard D. Varriano, is publicly reprimanded.  Respondent shall pay $900 in costs and disbursements under Rule 24.

            Dated:   December 18, 2002

                                                                                    BY THE COURT:

 

 

                                                                                    /s/Paul H. Anderson

                                                                                    Associate Justice

 

 

 

 

 

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.