Darlene F. Follese (nee Hall), Respondent, vs. Eastern Airlines and Fidelity and Casualty Insurance Company, n/k/a CNA Commercial Insurance Company, Relators, and Eastern Airlines and Employers Mutual Liability Insurance Company of Wausau, Respondents, and Special Compensation Fund.

Annotate this Case
Darlene F. Follese (nee Hall), Respondent, vs. Eastern Airlines and Fidelity and Casualty Insurance Company, n/k/a CNA Commercial Insurance Company, Relators, and Eastern Airlines and Employers Mutual Liability Insurance Company of Wausau, Respondents, and Special Compensation Fund. C7-02-1297, Supreme Court Order, November 14, 2002.

STATE OF MINNESOTA

 

IN SUPREME COURT

 

C7-02-1297

 

 

 

Darlene F. Follese (nee Hall),

 

                                                Respondent,

 

vs.

Eastern Airlines and Fidelity and Casualty

Insurance Company, n/k/a CNA

Commercial Insurance Company

 

                                                Relators,

 

and

 

Eastern Airlines and Employers Mutual

Liability Insurance Company of Wausau,

 

Respondents,

 

and

 

Special Compensation Fund.

 

 

 

            Considered and decided by the court en banc.

 

O R D E R

 

            Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

            IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers' Compensation Court  of  Appeals filed July 10, 2002, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. 
See Minn. R. Civ. App. P. 136.01.

            Employee is awarded $600 in attorney fees.

            Dated:  November 4, 2002

           

 

                                                                                    BY THE COURT:

 

                                               

                                                                                    /s/ Paul H. Anderson

                                                                                    Associate Justice

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.