In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action against Michael C. McCann, an Attorney at Law of the State of Minnesota.

Annotate this Case
In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action against Michael C. McCann, an Attorney at Law of the State of Minnesota. C1-02-128, Supreme Court Order, November 7, 2002.

STATE OF MINNESOTA

 

IN SUPREME COURT

C1-02-128

 

 

In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action against

Michael C. McCann, an Attorney at Law of the

State of Minnesota.

 

 

O R D E R

 

 

            The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility has filed a petition for disciplinary action alleging that respondent Michael C. McCann committed professional misconduct warranting public discipline, namely, failing to cooperate with the Director in his efforts to monitor compliance with respondent's probation and failing to promptly respond to the Director's correspondence by the due date in violation of Minn. R. Prof. Conduct 8.1(a)(3) and 8.4(c).

            Respondent admits his conduct violated the Rules of Professional Conduct, waives his rights under Rule 14, Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility (RLPR), and has entered into a stipulation with the Director in which they jointly recommend that the appropriate discipline is a public reprimand and two years of supervised probation subject to the following conditions:

a.         Respondent shall cooperate fully with the Director's Office in its efforts to monitor compliance with this probation and promptly respond to the Director's correspondence by the due date.  Respondent shall cooperate with the Director's investigation of any allegations of unprofessional conduct which may come to the Director's attention.  Upon the Director's request, respondent shall provide authorization for release of information and documentation to verify compliance with the terms of this probation.

 


b.         Respondent shall abide by the Minnesota Rules of Professional Conduct.

 

c.         Respondent shall be supervised by a licensed Minnesota attorney, appointed by the Director to monitor compliance with the terms of this probation.  Within two weeks from the date of this order respondent shall provide to the Director the names of four attorneys who have agreed to be nominated as respondent's supervisor.  If, after diligent effort, respondent is unable to locate a replacement supervisor acceptable to the Director, the Director will seek to appoint a supervisor.  Until a supervisor has signed a consent to supervise, the respondent shall, on the first day of each month, provide the Director with an inventory of active client files described in paragraph d. below.  Respondent shall make active client files available to the Director upon request.

 

d.         Respondent shall cooperate fully with the supervisor in his/her efforts to monitor compliance with this probation.  Respondent shall contact the supervisor and schedule a minimum of one in-person meeting per calendar quarter.  Respondent shall submit to the supervisor an inventory of all active client files by the first day of each month during the probation.  With respect to each active file, the inventory shall disclose the client name, type of representation, date opened, most recent activity, next anticipated action, and anticipated closing date.  Respondent's supervisor shall file written reports with the Director at least quarterly, or at such more frequent intervals as may reasonably be requested by the Director.

 

e.         Respondent shall initiate and maintain office procedures which ensure that there are prompt responses to correspondence, telephone calls, and other important communications from clients, courts and other persons interested in matters which respondent is handling, and which will ensure that respondent regularly reviews each and every file and completes legal matters on a timely basis.

 

f.          Within 30 days from the date of this order, respondent shall provide to the Director and to the probation supervisor, if any, a written plan outlining office procedures designed to ensure that respondent is in compliance with probation requirements.  Respondent shall provide progress reports as requested.

 

g.         Respondent shall maintain total abstinence from alcohol and other mood-altering chemicals, except that respondent may use prescription drugs in accordance with the directions of a prescribing physician who is fully advised of respondent's chemical dependency before issuing the prescription.

 


h.         Respondent shall attend weekly meetings of Alcoholics Anonymous or another outpatient alcohol treatment program acceptable to the Director.  Respondent shall, by the tenth day of each month, without a specific reminder or request, submit to the Director an attendance verification on a form provided by the Director, which provides the name, address and telephone number of the person personally verifying the attendance.  Such attendance verification shall also, upon request, be provided to the respondent's supervisor, if any.

 

i.          Respondent shall initiate or continue current treatment by a licensed consulting psychologist or other mental health professional acceptable to the Director, and shall complete all therapy programs recommended by the therapist.

 

            Respondent has also agreed to pay $900 in costs and $39 in disbursements under Rule 24, RLPR.

            This court has independently reviewed the file and approves the jointly recommended disposition.

            Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

            IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that respondent Michael C. McCann is publicly reprimanded and placed on probation for a period of two years.  Respondent shall pay $900 in costs and $39 in disbursements under Rule 24, RLPR.

            Dated:   November 1, 2002

                                                                                    BY THE COURT:

 

                                                                                    /s/Paul H. Anderson

                                                                                    Associate Justice

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.