List of ORDERS ON PETITIONS FOR FURTHER REVIEW FILED October 24, 2001

Annotate this Case
ORDERS ON PETITIONS FOR FURTHER REVIEW FILED October 24, 2001 Minnesota Supreme Court
ORDERS ON PETITIONS FOR FURTHER REVIEW FILED
October 24, 2001

1. Patrick J. Sutton v. Viking Oldsmobile Nissan, Inc. C2-99-1843 Denied 2. Randall M. Spears v. State C0-01-76 Granted & Stayed 3. Defenders of Wildlife, et al. v. Jesse Ventura, in his capacity as Governor of the State of Minnesota C3-01-329 Denied 4. Debra Ann Kunkel v. Joseph Gerard Kunkel C8-00-2101 Denied 5. Andrew Scott Kastner, Eric Nelson v. Star Trails Association C5-01-1157 and C4-01-1165 Granted 6. State v. Lorey Ann Hinds C8-00-1692 Denied 7. Prolife Minnesota v. Minnesota Pro-Life Committee, et al. C2-00-2160 Denied 8. David F. Braith v. Laure Jean Fischer CX-00-1967 Denied 9. State v. Shawn Mark Corrigan, et al. C0-00-2190, C2-00-2191 and C9-00-2205 - Denied 10. State v. Brandon Carl Heinl C0-00-2142 Denied 11. State v. Charles Anthony Yanez C0-00-2061 Denied 12. In Re the Marriage of: Jeanne Marie Wendel v. Bradley James Wendel - C6-01-129 - Denied 13. Larry L. Seaburg v. Allan H. Caplan, et al. C0-01-126 Denied 14. State v. Scott Andrew Kohser C7-00-1778 Denied 15. Dominium Austin Partners, LLC, et al., General Mills, Inc., Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, H.B. Fuller Company, Deluxe Corporation, KLT Investments, Inc. v. Joel Lindquist C5-00-2010 Denied 16. J.R.B. v. Department of Human Services, et al. C3-01-346 Denied 17. State v. Violet Mae Columbus C4-00-1950 Denied 18. State v. Robert Joseph Jeddeloh C2-01-676 Denied 19. David Beck v. Hennepin County Social Services and Minnesota Department of Human Services C6-01-342 Denied 20. State v. Elliott Lamar-Sesser Pierson C4-00-1821 Denied 21. Dean E. Morlock, et al. v. St. Paul Guardian Insurance Company C2-01-340 - Granted 22. State v. Ronald Richard Radke C2-01-158 Denied 23. In Re the Welfare of: A.J.S., C.A.S., A.R.S., A.P.S., C.A.S., and A.C.S. - CX-01-313 Denied

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.