List of ORDERS ON PETITIONS FOR FURTHER REVIEW FILED January 16, 2001.

Annotate this Case
ORDERS ON PETITIONS FOR FURTHER REVIEW FILED JANUARY 16, 2001 Minnesota Supreme Court
ORDERS ON PETITIONS FOR FURTHER REVIEW FILED
JANUARY 16, 2001

1. State v. Angel Dominquez Perez, a/k/a Edgar Luis Ceballos CX-00-883 Granted 2. Barbara Swaden Rosen v. PRIMUS Automobile Financial Services, Inc. C9-00-1006 and C1-00-1145 Denied 3. In the Matter of the Child of C.K. C8-00-848 Denied 4. State v. Blair Christian Weltzin C5-00-127 Granted 5. C.J.K. v. State, Department of Health C9-00-583 Denied 6. State v. Troy Allen Graupmann C3-00-756 Denied 7. State v. Garland Dean Barnes C3-99-2192 Denied 8. State v. Scottie Paul Smith C3-99-2208 Denied 9. State v. Burr Crowsbreast, III C3-00-14 Denied 10. Christiansen Construction Company, Inc. v. Tom Lundberg, et al., d/b/a Tom's Stop, Inc. C2-00-196 Denied 11. Chandra Renee Garrison, et al. v. Farmers Co-operative Exchange C1-00-657 - Denied 12. In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Clark Albert Bailey a/k/a Clark A. Kruger - C5-00-872 Denied 13. State v. Nancy Irene Fitzgerald C2-00-666 Denied 14. James W. Latta v. Dan Miner and the Mille Lacs Family Clinic C5-00-709 Denied 15. State v. Henry John Zimmerman C0-00-181 Denied 16. State v. William Jon Hogetvedt C5-00-175 Denied 17. State v. James Artey Scott C8-99-1880 Denied 18. Farmers' State Bank of Darwin v. Jill Swisher C9-00-261 Granted 19. St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company v. Gregory C. Fors, D.C., R.M., et al., D.J., et al. C5-99-914 Denied 20. State v. Rustin Kent Hartland C1-00-190 Denied 21. T.B.T.G. Foundation v. Timothy T. Pendleton and Timothy T. Pendleton v. G. Bradford Merkl, et al. C7-00-615 Denied 22. D & R Star, Inc. v. Gene Ackland C3-00-739 Denied 23. In the Matter of: Mark Prather C0-00-987 Denied 24. State v. Larry Michael Adams a/k/a Larry Michael Haller C4-99-2167 Denied 25. State v. Victor Alvarado Murillo, a/k/a Martin Camarilla C0-00-441 Denied 26. State v. Michael Dean Fahey C6-00-1061 Denied

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.