List of ORDERS ON PETITIONS FOR FURTHER REVIEW FILED May 16, 2000.

Annotate this Case
ORDERS ON PETITIONS FOR FURTHER REVIEW FILED MAY 16, 2000 Minnesota Supreme Court
ORDERS ON PETITIONS FOR FURTHER REVIEW FILED
MAY 16, 2000

1. Tower Insurance Company, Inc. v. Minnesota Holstein-Freisan Breeders' Association - C2-99-1003 Denied 2. State v. Glen Edward Underdahl C0-99-1050 Denied 3. In the Matter of the Welfare of: R.J.A., K.L.S., and M.E.M., Minor Children - C4-99-1181 Denied 4. State v. Chia James Vue C3-99-863 Denied 5. State v. James E. Aschenbrener C0-99-691 Denied 6. St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company v. Green Lake State Bank C1-99-1672 - Denied 7. Terry Lee Douglas, d/b/a Terry Lee Realty v. Dennis Schuette, et al. C2-99-1387 - Denied 8. Julie Gaarder, et al. v. Estate of Ortwin Norman Ostlie, Deceased, et al. CX-99-1007 - Denied 9. State v. Rogelio Tovar C1-99-1087 Denied 10. In Re the Marriage of: Rolf Edward Rogers v. Lisa Anne Rogers C2-99-1325 - Granted 11. Dr. Bimal C. Roquitte v. University of Minnesota C4-99-1200 Denied 12. State v. James Scott Scaife C5-99-1769 Denied 13. State v. Gerald Dwayne Cadena C9-99-1063 Denied 14. State v. Melvin (NMN) Johns, n/k/a Khabil Abudl Wakil C4-99-1620 Denied 15. State v. Willard Howard Wollin C1-99-845 Denied 16. In Re the Matter of: Mark LaChapelle v. Denise Mitten C5-99-1304 Denied 17. Thomas M. LeGro, et al. v. Robert C. Saterdalen, et al. C9-99-1483 Denied 18. In Re the Marriage of: Rosemary Ann Maurer v. Michael Patrick Maurer C7-99-1319 - Granted 19. In Re the Marriage of: Susan J. Pavey v. Michael G. Pavey C2-99-1549 Denied 20. Marcia Hunziker v. State Farm Insurance Companies C0-99-1436 Granted/Stayed 21. State v. Donald Lee Duncan CX-99-665 Denied 22. State v. John Patrick Murphy C0-99-1453 Denied 23. In the Matter of the Welfare of: S.L.M., Jr., T.A.M., T.J.M., and S.A.M. - CX-99-1699 Denied 24. Paul Reyes v. Sgt. Galland C1-99-1624 Denied 25. State v. James Elon Webb C1-99-1252 Denied

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.