In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action against Timothy Jay Zak, an Attorney at Law of the State of Minnesota.
Annotate this Case
STATE OF MINNESOTA
IN SUPREME COURT
C3-98-1923
In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action against
Timothy Jay Zak, an Attorney at Law of the
State of Minnesota.
O R D E R
On August 31, 1999, this Court reinstated respondent Timothy Jay Zak to the practice of law following a 3-month suspension and placed him on supervised probation for 2 years. In re Zak, 598 N.W.2d 692 (Minn. 1999).
The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility and respondent have entered into a stipulation wherein they jointly recommend that it would be appropriate to immediately discharge respondent from his supervised probation because respondent no longer maintains a law practice and his probation is an undue burden on his ability to register as a financial advisor in other states.
This court has independently reviewed the record and agrees that the jointly recommended discharge is appropriate.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that respondent Timothy Jay Zak is hereby discharged from supervised probation.
Dated: July 26, 2001
BY THE COURT:
/s/Paul H. Anderson
Associate JusticeSome case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
