Mary A. Obert, Respondent, vs. Bradley Dahl, petitioner, Appellant.

Annotate this Case
Mary A. Obert, Respondent, vs. Bradley Dahl, petitioner, Appellant. C3-97-1023, Supreme Court, January 28, 1999.

STATE OF MINNESOTA

IN SUPREME COURT

C3-97-1023

Court of Appeals

 

Page, J. Mary A. Obert,

Respondent,

vs.

Bradley Dahl, petitioner,

Appellant.

 

Filed: January 28, 1999
Office of Appellate Courts

 

Affirmed.

Heard, considered, and decided by the court en banc.

O P I N I O N

The legal issue presented in this case is identical to the legal issue presented in In re Estate of John Michael Palmen,____N.W.2d____(Minn., filed ______ 1998) (slip op. at___). Based on our reasoning in Palmen the decision of the court of appeals is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.