Neudek v. Neudek
Annotate this CaseThe district court's dismissal of Arthur Neudek's motion to modify parental rights and responsibilities provisions in connection with his 2006 divorce from Deborah Neudek, is vacated and remanded where the district court failed to conduct a hearing on Arthur's motion to modify. The supreme court held that the rules of procedure in family division cases expressly require the court to conduct a hearing on a motion to modify unless two specific conditions are met, both of which did not apply in Arthur's case. The court noted that when one party's filing of serial motions to modify becomes burdensome for the opposing party, the court may create orders or impose sanctions tailored to the circumstances presented.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.