Claudia Lowd v. Antonios N. Dimoulas (PDF)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

MAINE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT Decision: 2007 ME 61 Docket: Pen-06-354 Submitted On Briefs: March 29, 2007 Decided: May 17, 2007 Panel: Reporter of Decisions SAUFLEY, C.J., and CLIFFORD, ALEXANDER, CALKINS, LEVY, and SILVER, JJ. CLAUDIA LOWD v. ANTONIOS N. DIMOULAS PER CURIAM [¶1] Antonios N. Dimoulas appeals from an order entered in the District Court (Bangor, Gunther, J.) modifying an earlier divorce judgment. He contends that the court abused its discretion or committed legal or factual error in: (1) failing to award to him primary residential care of the parties children; (2) determining the parties incomes for purposes of child support; (3) failing to employ the child support guidelines for parents who provide substantially equal care; and (4) establishing the date upon which a retroactive decrease in child support would take effect. Because Dimoulas failed to submit an appendix that permits appellate review, we dismiss his appeal. See M.R. App. P. 8(j); State v. Ross, 2004 ME 12, ¶ 1, 841 A.2d 814, 814-15. Even if we were to reach the merits of the appeal, we 2 discern no basis for upsetting the modification judgment. See Grenier v. Grenier, 2006 ME 99, ¶ 20, 904 A.2d 403, 408; Payne v. Payne, 2006 ME 73, ¶ 7, 899 A.2d 793, 795; White v. Nason, 2005 ME 73, ¶ 15, 874 A.2d 891, 895; Dargie v. Dargie, 2001 ME 127, ¶ 23, 778 A.2d 353, 358. The entry is: Appeal dismissed. Attorney for plaintiff: Edward W. Gould, Esq. Gross, Minsky & Mogul, P.A. P.O. Box 917 Bangor, ME 04402-0917 Attorney for defendant: Michael P. Harman, Esq. Law Offices of Dean A. Beaupain 4 Hill Street Millinocket, ME 04462

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.