INQUIRY COMMISSION V. GREGORY CURTIS MENEFEE
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
TO BE PUBLISHED
Q
,;VUyrrxTCP 'U.
'Pt
2008-SC-000294-KB
INQUIRY COMMISSION
V.
IN SUPREME COURT
GREGORY CURTIS MENEFEE
RESPONDENT
OPINION AND ORDER
I . Introduction
The Inquiry Commission of the Kentucky Bar Association (KBA) requests that
Respondent, Gregory Curtis Menefee, KBA Member No. 83568, be temporarily
suspended from the practice of law in the Commonwealth of Kentucky pursuant to
Supreme Court Rule (SCR) 3.165(1). Menefee's Bar Roster address is 4610 Vinita
Way, Louisville, KY 40272 . The Inquiry Commission, in its petition to this Court, states
that it has probable cause to believe that Menefee has been misappropriating or
otherwise improperly dealing with funds that he holds for others . See SCR 3 .165(1)(a) .
Having reviewed the petition, the supporting evidence, and Menefee's response, we
agree there is probable cause to find Menefee has misappropriated or otherwise
improperly dealt with funds held on behalf of his clients and, thus, grant the petition .
II . Background
In support of its petition, the Inquiry Commission notes that over the past several
months it has received a series of seven complaints alleging, among other things, that
Menefee misappropriated or otherwise improperly handled client funds .' The first of
these complaints, filed by Joseph K. Halbleib in September of 2007, alleges Menefee
has failed to account for $5,500 .00 . Halbleib gave Menefee $9,500.00 to hold in
escrow . Over time, Menefee returned amounts totaling $4,000 .00. When Halbleib
sought additional funds, Menefee failed to deposit them as agreed. Halbleib has not
heard from Menefee since August of 2007.
The second complaint, brought by Thomas C. Tichenor, was filed in October of
2007. Tichenor retained Menefee in 2006 to handle his wife's estate . On behalf of the
estate, Menefee received $14,897 .36. While Menefee properly paid out $33.03, he
failed to account for the remaining $14,864 .33. Further, Tichenor alleges Menefee
failed to file a motion to set aside $15,000 .00 of the estate assets as personal property,
and may have failed to file documents with the Internal Revenue Service . Despite
repeated attempts, Tichenor has been unable to contact Menefee . However, in
September of 2007, Bruce Anderson, an attorney claiming to represent Menefee,
contacted Tichenor to inform him Menefee was no longer practicing law. To date,
Menefee has failed to account for client funds .
The third complaint, filed in November of 2007, concerned Menefee's
representation of Tami Barley in a bankruptcy action . Barley provided funds to Menefee
to hold in escrow for use against her home mortgage . Since August of 2007, Barley has
been unable to reach Menefee . When Barley left a note under Menefee's office door,
she was contacted by attorney Anderson. Anderson informed her Menefee was no
longer practicing law. Barley alleges Menefee failed to account for $1,746 .84 .
The KBA has opened a file on each complaint . See KBA File No. 15621, 15821, 15926, 16033,
16050, 16337, and 16348.
2
The fourth complaint, involving Menefee's representation of Tina M. Poison, was
filed in December of 2007 . Poison retained Menefee to handle her father's estate . In
addition, Menefee dealt with the insurance carrier following a fire at her father's house.
Through the course of his representation, Poison claims Menefee received $15,000 .00
from life insurance, and $58,000.00 in insurance proceeds for fire damage to the house
and its contents . Poison alleges Menefee agreed to take care of the repairs to the
home and the mortgage payments . When Menefee failed to pay the mortgage, the
home was sold at a commissioner's sale. Over a period of seven months, Poison
attempted to contact Menefee to no avail . While Poison acknowledges receiving
$3,000 .00 from Menefee, the remaining $70,000 .00 has never been returned to her or
accounted for by Menefee .
The fifth complaint was filed by Billy Hill in February of 2008 . Hill, as
administrator of the estate of Betty Jean Price, retained Menefee. Estate assets,
totaling $37,233 .88, were provided to Menefee to hold in escrow. From these funds,
Menefee properly paid estate expenses totaling $14,296.35 . To date, Menefee has
failed to account for the remaining $22,937.53.
The final two complaints, both filed in March of 2008, involved bankruptcy cases
handled by Menefee . In one, Ronald Lee Yocum alleges he placed funds with Menefee
during his bankruptcy . When he asked Menefee to transfer the funds to his divorce
attorney, Menefee made no response . In the second case, Gina and Jeffery Followay
provided $29,425 .00 to Menefee to hold in escrow. Of this amount, Menefee paid
$6,967 .59 in creditor claims and $2,000 .00 to the Followays . When the Followays
attempted to obtain an additional $2,000 .00 from Menefee, they received no response .
Despite repeated attempts to reach Menefee, the Followays received no reply until they
were contacted by attorney Anderson . Anderson informed the Followays that Menefee
was no longer practicing law. To date, Menefee has failed to return or account for the
remaining $20,457 .41 belonging to the Followays, or any of the funds he received on
behalf of Yocum .
With the exception of the last two claims, the KBA has forwarded each of the
complaints to Menefee for a response in accordance with SCR 3 .160. While Menefee
filed motions for extension of time to respond to the first four claims, he has failed to file
responses in any of the complaints . At the time the petition now before this Court was
filed, Menefee had not been served with the final two complaints . However, all seven
complaints were included by the Inquiry Commission in support of the present petition.
In response to the Inquiry Commission's petition for temporary suspension under
SCR 3.165, Menefee has indicated he has no objection to the suspension . Menefee
claims he began to wind up his practice of law in August of 2007 . At present, Menefee
claims he is employed in a field other than law, and that he has no plans to resume the
practice of law. For this reason, Menefee determined a detailed response to the factual
allegations was not necessary.
111. Conclusion
Given the evidence supporting the Inquiry Commission's petition, and Menefee's
failure to respond, either to the KBA or this Court, as to the merits of the complaints, we
find probable cause exists to believe, pursuant to SCR 3 .165(1)(a), that Menefee has
misappropriated or otherwise improperly dealt with funds held on behalf of his clients
and, thus, hereby grant the petition for temporary suspension .
ACCORDINGLY, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED :
(1)
The Respondent, Gregory Curtis Menefee, KBA Member No. 83568, is
temporarily suspended from the practice of law in the Commonwealth of Kentucky,
pending further orders of this Court .
(2)
_ Disciplinary proceedings against Menefee shall be, initiated by the Inquiry
Commission pursuant to SCR 3 .160, unless already begun or unless Menefee resigns
under terms of disbarment .
(3)
Pursuant to SCR 3.165(5), Menefee shall, within twenty (20) days of the
date of entry of this order, notify all clients in writing f of his inability to continue to
represent them, and shall furnish copies of such letters of notice to the Director of the
KBA .
(4)
Pursuant to SCR 3.165(6), Menefee shall immediately, to the extent
possible, cancel and cease any legal practice advertising activities in which he is
engaged .
All sitting . All concur .
ENTERED: June 19, 2008 .
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.