KENT HILL V. KENTUCKY PAROLE BOARD
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
RENDERED : APRIL 24, 2008
TO BE PUBLISHED
sixyrQmQ C~Vixxf of ~i
2006-SC-000481-DG
APPELLANT
KENT HILL
ON REVIEW FROM COURT OF APPEALS
CASE NUMBER 2006-CA-000801
FRANKLIN CIRCUIT COURT NO . 05-CI-01507
KENTUCKY PAROLE BOARD
APPELLEE
OPINION OF THE COURT BY JUSTICE SCHRODER
REVERSING AND REMANDING
The issue in this appeal is whether failure to timely tender the $25.00 court
facility fee in addition to the $125.00 filing fee (with the notice of appeal) requires an
automatic dismissal of the appeal. Although the court facility fee was authorized by
statute, and by statute is to be collected by the clerk at the time the notice of appeal is
filed, the civil rules were not amended to implement the collection of the court facility fee
at the time the filing fee is paid and the notice of appeal is filed. Therefore, we reverse
the Court of Appeals and remand the matter for further proceedings .
On November 1, 2005, Kent Hill, a pro se inmate, filed an appeal of a decision of
the Kentucky Parole Board in the Franklin Circuit Court. The petition was dismissed by
the circuit court on the merits on February 27, 2006, and Hill's CR 59 .05 motion to alter
or amend was denied on March 7, 2006 . Within 30 days, Hill timely tendered a Notice
of Appeal and a filing fee of $125.00 to the Franklin County Circuit Court Clerk. CR
73.02(1). The clerk returned the notice and the check for $125 .00 with an explanation
that the filing fee is $150 .00. The clerk's note is dated April 6, 2006, which was the last
day to timely file a notice of appeal pursuant to CR 73.02(1). Shortly thereafter, Hill sent
the notice of appeal with a check for $150.00 to the clerk. The Franklin County Circuit
Court Clerk issued a receipt on April 13, 2006, which was more than thirty days from the
denial of the CR 59 .05 motion .
The Court of Appeals issued a show cause to Kent Hill as to why his appeal
should not be dismissed for failure to timely file his notice of appeal. Hill's response
was that he timely sent the notice with the $125 .00 filing fee as set forth in CR 76.42(2) ;
that there was no notice of the extra $25 .00 court facility fee ; and that he substantially
complied with the requirements for filing an appeal . The Court of Appeals recognized
that in addition to the $125 .00 filing fee authorized by CR 76.42(2)(a)(i), KRS
23A.220(3) permits a fiscal court to impose an additional $25 .00 court facility fee to be
collected by the circuit court clerk at the same time the filing fee is collected and the
notice of appeal filed. The Franklin County Fiscal Court did adopt the $25 .00 court
facility fee which was to be collected by the Circuit Clerk at the time the notice of appeal
and the $125 .00 filing fee were filed . The Court of Appeals determined that the fiscal
court did adopt the court facility fee, and that the statute required the collection of the
court facility fee when the clerk collected the filing fee . Therefore, the court concluded
that the Appellant did not tender the entire amount of the fees with the notice of appeal,
that the subsequent tender was not timely, and that the appeal must be dismissed.
We granted discretionary review to determine whether an appeal should
automatically be dismissed for failure to file the court facility fee within the time required
for filing the notice of appeal and the filing fee . CR 73.01(2) requires a person desiring
to appeal a court decision to file a notice of appeal in the court from which the appeal is
taken. CR 73.02(1)(a) requires the notice of appeal be filed within thirty days of the
judgment or order appealed. CR 73.02(1)(b) requires the filing fee required by
76.42(2)(a)(i) accompany the notice of appeal, and the notice is not to be filed without
said fee for an appeal . CR 76 .42(2)(a)(i) sets the filing fee at $125 .00 .
KRS 23A.220(1) authorizes a $25.00 court facility fee to be collected, in addition
to a filing fee, on civil actions filed in circuit court. KRS 23A.220(2) authorizes that, in
criminal cases, a $25 .00 court facility fee may be added to the court costs a defendant
is required to pay. KRS 24A.185(5) authorizes a court facility fee on civil actions filed in
the district court . KRS 23A .220(3) authorizes a $25.00 court facility fee to be collected
by the circuit clerk with the filing fee when a notice of appeal is filed . The civil rules
were subsequently amended by the Supreme Court to deal with the court facility fee.'
The circuit clerk is instructed by CR 3.02(1)(b) to collect the court facility fee, in addition
to the filing fee, at the time of filing suit in circuit court. CR 3.03(1)(k) requires the
district clerk to collect the court facility fee, in addition to the filing fee, at the time of filing
suit in district court . CR 76.42(1) however states, "[e]xcept for a filing fee, no costs shall
be taxed in proceedings in the Supreme Court and Court of Appeals . . . ."
Whether or not the omission of the court facility fee in the civil rules for cases
appealed to the Supreme Court or the Court of Appeals was intentional or an oversight
is not for us to decide in this appeal. The rule says what it says, only a filing fee has to
be collected with the filing of the notice of appeal. Kent Hill timely tendered the notice of
appeal with the filing fee required by the civil rules. His appeal should have been
' Effective January 1, 2005 (2005-1) .
docketed. Although the statutory court facility fee may still be collected on appeals to
the Supreme Court and to the Court of Appeals, the civil rules do not specify when to
collect the fee in appeals. Therefore, payment of the court facility fee is not a condition
precedent to filing the notice of appeal, as is the filing fee. The trial court may issue a
show cause order to ensure the court facility fee is paid, but failure to tender the court
facility fee within the time limits of CR 73.02(1)(a) shall not result in the automatic
dismissal of the appeal.
Accordingly, the order of dismissal of the Court of Appeals is reversed and this
matter is remanded for reinstatement of Appellant's appeal upon payment of the filing
fee and the refiling of the notice of appeal .
All sitting . All concur.
COUNSEL FOR APPELLANT :
Mark Stavsky
Chase College of Law
Northern Kentucky University
Room 520
Nunn Hall
Nunn Drive
Highland Heights, KY 41099
COUNSEL FOR APPELLEE:
Brenn Oliver Combs
Justice and Public Safety Cabinet
Office of Legal Services
125 Holmes St.
Second Floor
Frankfort, KY 40601
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.