State v. Valdez
Annotate this Case
The Supreme Court affirmed the judgment of the district court summarily denying Defendant's pro se motion to correct an illegal sentence under Kan. Stat. Ann. 22-3504, holding that the district court did not err in denying the motion.
After a 1996 jury trial, Defendant was convicted of first-degree murder and other crimes. In 2017, Defendant brought the instant pro se motion to correct an illegal sentence. The district court denied the motion without holding an evidentiary hearing. The Supreme Court affirmed, holding that Defendant's motion to correct an illegal sentence under section 22-3504 failed.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.