Krueger v. Board of Woodson County Comm'rs

Annotate this Case

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS

No. 89,592

KAREN J. KRUEGER,

Appellant,

v.

BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF

WOODSON COUNTY, KANSAS,

and

COUNTY APPRAISER OF WOODSON COUNTY, KANSAS,

Appellees.

Review of the judgment of the Court of Appeals in 31 Kan. App. 2d 698, 71 P.3d 1167 (2003). Appeal from Woodson district court; C. FRED LORENTZ, judge. Judgment of the Court of Appeals affirming the district court is affirmed. Judgment of the district court is affirmed. Opinion filed March 19, 2004.

Karen J. Krueger, pro se, argued the cause and was on the briefs for appellant.

Jerry B. Hathaway, county attorney, argued the cause and Leo T. Gensweider, former county attorney, was on the brief for appellee.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

NUSS, J.: Karen Krueger contested the appraisal of her house for tax years 1999, 2000, and 2001. The Board of Tax Appeals (BOTA) upheld the appraisal value, as did the district court. In a published opinion by Judge Lewis, a unanimous panel of the Court of Appeals affirmed. This court granted Krueger's petition for review.

We have carefully considered and reviewed the briefs, arguments, and the record in this case, and we conclude that the Court of Appeals was correct. We, therefore, adopt the opinion of the Court of Appeals and affirm BOTA, the district court, and the Court of Appeals.

BEIER, J., not participating.

BRAZIL, S.J., assigned.1

1REPORTER'S NOTE: Judge J. Patrick Brazil was appointed to hear case No. 89,592 vice Justice Beier pursuant to the authority vested in the Supreme Court by K.S.A. 20-2616.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.