Paternity: Darrell Laray Jones v. Chastity Alexis Tramell

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision is not binding precedent for any court and may be cited only for persuasive value or to establish res judicata, collateral estoppel, or law of the case. FILED Apr 25 2024, 9:14 am CLERK Indiana Supreme Court Court of Appeals and Tax Court IN THE Court of Appeals of Indiana Darrell Laray Jones, Appellant-Petitioner v. Chastity Alexis Tramell, Appellee-Respondent April 25, 2024 Court of Appeals Case No. 23A-JP-2749 Appeal from the Marion Superior Court The Honorable Melanie Kendrick Trial Court Cause No. 49D22-1903-JP-10912 Memorandum Decision by Judge Vaidik Judges May and Kenworthy concur. Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 23A-JP-2749 | April 25, 2024 Page 1 of 3 Vaidik, Judge. [1] This is a paternity case involving Darrell Laray Jones (“Father”), Chastity Alexis Tramell (“Mother”), and their young child, K.J. On November 9, 2023, the trial court held a hearing—which Father didn’t attend—and then issued an order that, among other things, awarded sole legal and physical custody to Mother, awarded supervised parenting time to Father, and directed Father to pay child support of $168 per week plus an arrearage of $31,775. Father, acting pro se, now appeals. [2] Mother contends that Father waived his arguments by failing to comply with the Indiana Rules of Appellate Procedure. We agree. Father’s brief doesn’t include a statement of issues, a statement of facts, a summary of argument, or a standard of review, as required by Appellate Rule 46(A)(4), (6), (7), and (8). There are no citations to the record on appeal or to legal authority, as required by Appellate Rule 46(A)(5), (6), and (8). Most importantly, Father’s contentions—to the extent he has offered any–aren’t supported by cogent reasoning as required by Appellate Rule 46(A)(8)(a). Rather, his brief seems to be a rundown of the testimony and arguments he would have presented if he had appeared at the hearing in November 2023. See, e.g., Appellant’s Br. p. 9 (“The appellant wishes to challenge certain statements made in the transcript and draw attention to the possibility that the appellee’s legal defense summary testimony may have influenced the summary testimony of the Guardian ad litem and even affected the lower court’s ruling.”). But an appeal isn’t a second bite at the apple. Our role is to review the record as presented to the trial court Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 23A-JP-2749 | April 25, 2024 Page 2 of 3 to determine whether any error was committed. We can’t consider additional evidence or issues that weren’t presented below. Israel v. Israel, 189 N.E.2d 170, 177 (Ind. Ct. App. 2022) (“[A]n issue raised by an appellant for the first time on appeal is waived.”), reh’g denied, trans. denied; Saler v. Irick, 800 N.E.2d 960, 970 n.7 (Ind. Ct. App. 2003) (“[N]ew evidence may not be submitted to the court for the first time upon appeal.”). [3] Given the lack of cogent argument and the other significant rule violations, Father has waived appellate review. See Perry v. Anonymous Physician 1, 25 N.E.3d 103, 105 n.1 (Ind. Ct. App. 2014) (“While we prefer to decide cases on their merits, alleged errors are waived where an appellant’s noncompliance with the rules of appellate procedure is so substantial it impedes our appellate consideration of the errors.”), trans. denied. We therefore affirm the trial court’s order. [4] Affirmed. May, J., and Kenworthy, J., concur. APPELLANT PRO SE Darrell Laray Jones Indianapolis, Indiana ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEE Katherine A. Rich The Northside Law Firm Westfield, Indiana Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 23A-JP-2749 | April 25, 2024 Page 3 of 3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.