Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Au
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCAD-13-0000911 21-JAN-2014 10:37 AM SCAD-13-0000911 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner, vs. RONALD G.S. AU, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (ODC 11 16-8940) ORDER OF SUSPENSION (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, and Pollack, JJ. and Intermediate Court of Appeals Associate Judge Foley, in place of Acoba, J., recused) Upon consideration of the May 17, 2013 Report and Recommendation of the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of the State of Hawai#i (hereinafter, the Disciplinary Board ), the briefs filed by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (ODC) and the Respondent, Ronald G.S. Au, and the record, we adopt the Disciplinary Board s Report and Recommendation, and, therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Respondent Ronald G.S. Au is suspended for a further five years, effective immediately, notwithstanding Rule 2.16(c) of the Rules of the Supreme Court of the State of Hawai#i (RSCH), in light of the fact Respondent Au is currently suspended from the practice of law. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Respondent Au shall file with this court, within 30 days after the date of entry of this order, an affidavit showing compliance with RSCH Rule 2.16(d) and this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, in addition to any other requirements for reinstatement imposed by the Rules of the Supreme Court of the State of Hawai#i, Respondent Au shall pay all costs of these proceedings as approved upon the timely submission of a verified bill of costs by ODC and an opportunity to respond thereto, as prescribed by RSCH Rule 2.3(c). IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that Respondent Au s motion for permission to petition for reinstatement is denied and, further, that Respondent Au, pursuant to RSCH Rule 2.17(b)(3), may not petition for reinstatement until two and a half years have elapsed from the date of entry of this order. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, January 21, 2014. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack /s/ Daniel R. Foley 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
