Hawaii State Teachers Association and Hawaii Labor Relations Board

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-13-0000053 22-FEB-2013 02:05 PM SCPW-13-0000053 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I HAWAI#I STATE TEACHERS ASSOCIATION, Petitioner, and HAWAI#I LABOR RELATIONS BOARD; JAMES B. NICHOLSON, CHAIRPERSON, HAWAI#I LABOR RELATIONS BOARD; and ROCK B. LEY, MEMBER, HAWAI#I LABOR RELATIONS BOARD (2013-003), Respondents. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (HLRB CASE NO. CE-05-781) ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, and Pollack, JJ., and Circuit Judge Chang, in place of McKenna, J., recused) Upon consideration of the January 28, 2013 petition for a writ of mandamus filed by the Hawai#i State Teachers Association ( HSTA ), the documents attached thereto and submitted in support thereof, and the record, it appears that, at this time, the HSTA is not entitled to the requested mandamus relief in light of the voluminous record, the extended duration of the proceedings, and other relevant circumstances concerning the disposition of other prohibited practices cases before the Hawai#i Labor Relations Board. See Kema v. Gaddis, 91 Hawai#i 200, 204, 982 P.2d 334, 338 (1999) (a writ of mandamus is an extraordinary remedy that will not issue unless the petitioner demonstrates a clear and indisputable right to relief and a lack of alternative means to redress adequately the alleged wrong or obtain the requested action); In re Disciplinary Bd., 94 Hawai#i 363, 368 & 371, 984 P.2d 688, 693 & 695 (1999) (mandamus relief is available to compel an official to perform a duty allegedly owed to an individual only if the individual s claim is clear and certain, the official s duty is ministerial and so plainly prescribed as to be free from doubt, and no other remedy is available). Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for a writ of mandamus is denied. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, February 22, 2013. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr. /s/ Richard W. Pollack /s/ Gary W.B. Chang 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.