Animal Care Foundation, Inc. v. Hawaiian Humane Society, Inc.
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NO. 25482 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I ANIMAL CARE FOUNDATION, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant vs. HAWAIIAN HUMANE SOCIETY, INC., and PAMELA BURNS, Defendants-Appellees and JOHN AND MARY DOES 1-10 and DOE CORPORATIONS, PARTNERSHIPS OR OTHER ENTITIES 1-10, Defendants APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT (CIVIL NO. 1RC02-1-05422) ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (By: Moon, C.J., Levinson, Nakayama, and Acoba, JJ., and Circuit Judge Nakea, assigned by reason of vacancy) Upon consideration of the motion for reconsideration of the February 12, 2003 order dismissing appeal, the papers in support and the record, it appears that HRAP 26(c) does not apply to the provisions of HRAP 4(a)(1) and the mailing of the notice of appeal to the district court did not affect the thirty-day period for filing the notice of appeal. Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion for reconsideration is denied. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, March 3, 2003.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
