State v. Baraoidan
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NO. 23001 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI`I ) ) ) Plaintiff-Appellant, ) ) vs. ) ) RUPERTO A. BARAOIDAN, JR., ) ) Defendant-Appellee. _______________________________ ) STATE OF HAWAI`I, CR. NO. 99-0222 APPEAL FROM FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, AND ORDER, filed on November 2, 1999. SECOND CIRCUIT COURT SUMMARY DISPOSITION ORDER Upon carefully reviewing the record and the briefs submitted by the parties and having given due consideration to the arguments advanced and the issues raised by the parties, we hold that, inasmuch as (1) Maui police Officer Randy Esperanza testified that he approached Baraoidan for an investigative purpose but did not inform Baraoidan that he was free to leave and could decline to participate in the investigative encounter, and (2) the specific and articulable facts to which Officer Esperanza pointed, taken together with the rational inferences that could be drawn from those facts, did not reasonably warrant Officer Esperanza s instigation of an investigative encounter with Baraoidan, the investigative encounter constituted, at its inception, an unreasonable seizure, under article I, section 7 of the Hawai`i Constitution. See State v. Trainor, 83 Hawai`i 250, 925 P.2d 818 (1996); State v. Kearns, 75 Haw. 558, 867 P.2d 903; State v. Quino, 74 Haw. 161, 840 P.2d 358 (1992). Accordingly, we further hold that the circuit court did not err in granting Baraoidan s motion to suppress evidence recovered during and as a result of the unconstitutional seizure. See, e.g., State v. Temple, 65 Haw. 261, 272, 650 P.2d 1358, 1365 (1982) (evidence obtained pursuant to an encounter that was unjustified at its inception held inadmissible). Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the findings of fact, conclusions of law, and order, filed on November 22, 1999, from which the present appeal is taken is affirmed. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai`i, June 8, 2000. On the briefs: Richard K. Minatoya, (Deputy Prosecuting Attorney), for the plaintiff-appellant State of Hawai`i Adrianne N. Heely, (Deputy Public Defender), for the defendant-appellee Ruperto A. Baraoidan __________________________ RONALD T.Y. MOON Chief Justice __________________________ STEVEN H. LEVINSON Associate Justice __________________________ PAULA A. NAKAYAMA Associate Justice __________________________ MARIO R. RAMIL Associate Justice __________________________ SIMEON R. ACOBA, JR. Associate Justice 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
