Attorneys’ Title Insurance Fund, Inc. v. M.I. Industries Usa, Inc., Et Al.

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Supreme Court of Florida ____________ No. SC09-938 ____________ ATTORNEYS TITLE INSURANCE FUND, INC., Petitioner, vs. M.I. INDUSTRIES USA, INC., et al., Respondents. [April 22, 2010] PER CURIAM. We initially accepted jurisdiction to review the decision of the Fourth District Court of Appeal in M.I. Industries USA Inc. v. Attorneys Title Insurance Fund, Inc., 6 So. 3d 627 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009). In its decision the district court certified the following question to be of great public importance: INCIDENT TO AN ACTION AT LAW, MAY A TRIAL COURT ISSUE AN INJUNCTION TO FREEZE ASSETS OF A DEFENDANT, WHERE THE PLAINTIFF HAS DEMONSTRATED: (1) THE DEFENDANT WILL TRANSFER, DISSIPATE, OR HIDE HIS/HER ASSETS SO AS TO RENDER A TRIAL JUDGMENT UNENFORCEABLE; (2) A CLEAR LEGAL RIGHT TO THE RELIEF REQUESTED; (3) A SUBSTANTIAL LIKELIHOOD OF SUCCESS ON THE MERITS; AND (4) A TEMPORARY INJUNCTION WILL SERVE THE PUBLIC INTEREST? Id. at 629. After further consideration, we have determined that we should exercise our discretion and discharge jurisdiction. Accordingly, this review proceeding is dismissed. It is so ordered. QUINCE, C.J., and PARIENTE, LEWIS, CANADY, POLSTON, LABARGA, and PERRY, JJ., concur. NO MOTION FOR REHEARING WILL BE ALLOWED. Application for Review of the Decision of the District Court of Appeal - Certified Great Public Importance Fourth District - Case No. 4D07-4992 (Broward County) Arthur J. England, Jr. of Greenberg Traurig, P.A., Miami, Florida, Robert A. Cohen, and Aaron C. Wong of Cohen Fox, P.A., Miami, Florida for Petitioner -2-

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.