Kevin M. Steele v. Susan B. Kinsey

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Supreme Court of Florida ____________ No. SC02-152 ____________ KEVIN M. STEELE, Petitioner, vs. SUSAN B. KINSEY and UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondents. [February 13, 2003] PER CURIAM. We initially accepted jurisdiction to review Steele v. Kinsey, 801 So. 2d 297 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001), a decision of a district court of appeal certifying conflict with the decision of another district court of appeal. Upon reflection and further consideration, we now conclude that review was improvidently granted. Accordingly, this review proceeding is dismissed. It is so ordered. ANSTEAD, C.J., and WELLS, PARIENTE, CANTERO, and BELL, JJ., concur. LEWIS and QUINCE, JJ., dissent. NO MOTION FOR REHEARING WILL BE ALLOWED. Application for Review of the Decision of the District Court of Appeal - Certified Direct Conflict of Decisions Second District - Case Nos. 2D00-4295, 2D00-4384 and 2D01-533 (Hillsborough County) Louis K. Rosenbloum of Law Offices of Louis K. Rosenbloum, P.A., Pensacola, Florida; and Dale Swope, Tampa, Florida, for Petitioner Hinda Klein of Conroy, Simberg, Ganon, Krevans & Abel, P.A., Hollywood, Florida, for Respondents Philip M. Burlington of Caruso, Burlington, Bohn & Compiani, P.A., West Palm Beach, Florida, for the Academy of Florida Trial Lawyers, Amicus Curiae David B. Pakula, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, for Florida Defense Lawyers Association, Amicus Curiae for Respondent -2-

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.