Douglas Isom v. State of Florida

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Supreme Court of Florida ____________ No. SC00-724 ____________ DOUGLAS ISOM, Petitioner, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. [July 12, 2001] PER CURIAM. We initially accepted review in Isom v. State, 750 So. 2d 734 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000), based on an alleged express and direct conflict with the First District s decision in Daniels v. State, 593 So. 2d 312 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992). Upon closer examination, however, we find that jurisdiction was improvidently granted in this case. Therefore, we dismiss review of this cause. It is so ordered. WELLS, C.J., and SHAW, HARDING, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, LEWIS, and QUINCE, JJ., concur. NO MOTION FOR REHEARING WILL BE ALLOWED. Application for Review of the Decision of the District Court of Appeal Direct Conflict Third District - Case No. 3D97-2430 (Dade County) Mary E. Adkins, Melrose, Florida, for Petitioner Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Michael J. Neimand, Senior Assistant Attorney General, and Douglas J. Glaid, Assistant Attorney General, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, for Respondent -2-

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.