Irvine v. Redfield,
64 U.S. 170 (1859)

Annotate this Case
  • Syllabus  | 
  • Case

U.S. Supreme Court

Irvine v. Redfield, 64 U.S. 23 How. 170 170 (1859)

Irvine v. Redfield

64 U.S. (23 How.) 170


The duties upon foreign merchandise are to be computed on their value on the day of the sailing of the vessel from the foreign port. See 61 U. S. 20 How. 571

This was an action of assumpsit on the money counts brought by the plaintiffs against the defendant as collector. Upon the trial, the division in opinion between the judges occurred, which is stated in the opinion of the Court.

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.