Kock v. Emmerling,
63 U.S. 69 (1859)

Annotate this Case
  • Syllabus  | 
  • Case

U.S. Supreme Court

Kock v. Emmerling, 63 U.S. 22 How. 69 69 (1859)

Kock v. Emmerling

63 U.S. (22 How.) 69


Where an agent was employed to sell an estate in Louisiana, and the owner refused, without sufficient reasons, to fulfill an agreement which the agent had made, a right to demand compensation accrued to the agent, the amount of which is to be settled by established usage.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

Page 63 U. S. 72

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.