In re Grand Jury, 598 U.S. ___ (2023)
NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the preliminary print of the United States Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of the United States, Washington, D. C. 20543, of any typographical or other formal errors, in order that corrections may be made before the preliminary print goes to press.
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
_________________
No. 21–1397
_________________
IN RE GRAND JURY
on writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the ninth circuit
[January 23, 2023]
Per Curiam.
The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted.
It is so ordered.
| Motion (21M105) for leave to file a petition for a writ of certiorari under seal with redacted copies for the public record filed. |
| Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 1, 2022) |
| MOTION (21M105) DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/29/2022. |
| Motion (21M105) for leave to file a petition for a writ of certiorari under seal with redacted copies for the public record Granted. |
| Motion to extend the time to file a response from June 1, 2022 to July 1, 2022, submitted to The Clerk. |
| Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including July 1, 2022. |
| Brief amicus curiae of Washington Legal Foundation filed. |
| Brief amicus curiae of California Lawyers Association filed. |
| Brief amicus curiae of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America filed. |
| Motion to extend the time to file a response from July 1, 2022 to August 1, 2022, submitted to The Clerk. |
| Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including August 1, 2022. |
| Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed. |
| Reply of petitioner In Re Grand Jury filed. |
| DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022. |
| Petition GRANTED. |
| Consent to the filing of amicus briefs received from counsel for In Re Grand Jury submitted. |
| Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, In Re Grand Jury |
| SET FOR ARGUMENT on Monday, January 9, 2023. |
| Record requested from the U.S.C.A. 9th Circuit. |
| Brief of In Re Grand Jury submitted. |
| for Leave to File Joint Appendix Under Seal of In Re Grand Jury submitted. |
| Amicus brief of New York Intellectual Property Law Association submitted. |
| Brief of petitioner In Re Grand Jury filed. |
| Brief amicus curiae of New York Intellectual Property Law Association in support of neither party filed. |
| Amicus brief of Association of Professional Responsibility Lawyers submitted. |
| Amicus brief of Washington Legal Foundation submitted. |
| Amicus brief of Silicon Valley Tax Directors Group submitted. |
| Brief amicus curiae of Association of Professional Responsibility Lawyers in support of neither party filed. |
| Amicus brief of The Buckeye Institute submitted. |
| Amicus brief of Atlantic Legal Foundation submitted. |
| Amicus brief of Lawyers for Civil Justice submitted. |
| Amicus brief of DRI Center for Law and Public Policy submitted. |
| Amicus brief of California Lawyers Association submitted. |
| Amicus brief of American College of Tax Counsel submitted. |
| Amicus brief of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, Association of Corporate Counsel, and Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association submitted. |
| Amicus brief of Federation of Defense & Corporate Counsel submitted. |
| Amicus brief of American Bar Association submitted. |
| Amicus brief of The Buckeye Institute submitted. |
| Brief amicus curiae of Silicon Valley Tax Directors Group filed. |
| Brief amicus curiae of Washington Legal Foundation filed. |
| Brief amicus curiae of DRI Center for Law and Public Policy filed. |
| Brief amicus curiae of The Buckeye Institute filed. |
| Brief amici curiae of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, et al. filed. |
| Brief amicus curiae of Atlantic Legal Foundation filed. |
| Brief amicus curiae of California Lawyers Association filed. |
| Brief amicus curiae of American College of Tax Counsel filed. |
| Brief amicus curiae of Federation of Defense & Corporate Counsel filed. |
| Brief amicus curiae of American Bar Association filed. |
| Brief amicus curiae of Lawyers for Civil Justice filed. |
| Motion for leave to file the joint appendix under seal filed by petitioner. |
| CIRCULATION |
| Record received from the U.S.C.A. 9th Circuit. The record is electronic and contains sealed materials. |
| Motion for leave to file the joint appendix under seal GRANTED. |
| Brief of United States submitted. |
| Brief of respondent United States filed. (Distributed) |
| Reply of petitioner In Re Grand Jury filed. (Distributed) |
| Argued. For petitioner: Daniel B. Levin, Los Angeles, Cal. For respondent: Masha G. Hansford, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. |
Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
