In re Grand Jury, 598 U.S. ___ (2023)

NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the preliminary print of the United States Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of the United States, Washington, D. C. 20543, of any typographical or other formal errors, in order that corrections may be made before the preliminary print goes to press.

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

_________________

No. 21–1397

_________________

IN RE GRAND JURY

on writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the ninth circuit

[January 23, 2023]

Per Curiam.

The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted.

It is so ordered.

April 1, 2022 Motion (21M105) for leave to file a petition for a writ of certiorari under seal with redacted copies for the public record filed.
April 1, 2022 Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 1, 2022)
April 13, 2022 MOTION (21M105) DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/29/2022.
May 2, 2022 Motion (21M105) for leave to file a petition for a writ of certiorari under seal with redacted copies for the public record Granted.
May 6, 2022 Motion to extend the time to file a response from June 1, 2022 to July 1, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
May 9, 2022 Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including July 1, 2022.
June 1, 2022 Brief amicus curiae of Washington Legal Foundation filed.
June 1, 2022 Brief amicus curiae of California Lawyers Association filed.
June 1, 2022 Brief amicus curiae of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America filed.
June 22, 2022 Motion to extend the time to file a response from July 1, 2022 to August 1, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
June 23, 2022 Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including August 1, 2022.
August 1, 2022 Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
August 12, 2022 Reply of petitioner In Re Grand Jury filed.
August 17, 2022 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
October 3, 2022 Petition GRANTED.
October 27, 2022 Consent to the filing of amicus briefs received from counsel for In Re Grand Jury submitted.
October 27, 2022 Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, In Re Grand Jury
November 10, 2022 SET FOR ARGUMENT on Monday, January 9, 2023.
November 16, 2022 Record requested from the U.S.C.A. 9th Circuit.
November 16, 2022 Brief of In Re Grand Jury submitted.
November 16, 2022 for Leave to File Joint Appendix Under Seal of In Re Grand Jury submitted.
November 17, 2022 Amicus brief of New York Intellectual Property Law Association submitted.
November 16, 2022 Brief of petitioner In Re Grand Jury filed.
November 17, 2022 Brief amicus curiae of New York Intellectual Property Law Association in support of neither party filed.
November 21, 2022 Amicus brief of Association of Professional Responsibility Lawyers submitted.
November 22, 2022 Amicus brief of Washington Legal Foundation submitted.
November 22, 2022 Amicus brief of Silicon Valley Tax Directors Group submitted.
November 21, 2022 Brief amicus curiae of Association of Professional Responsibility Lawyers in support of neither party filed.
November 23, 2022 Amicus brief of The Buckeye Institute submitted.
November 23, 2022 Amicus brief of Atlantic Legal Foundation submitted.
November 23, 2022 Amicus brief of Lawyers for Civil Justice submitted.
November 23, 2022 Amicus brief of DRI Center for Law and Public Policy submitted.
November 23, 2022 Amicus brief of California Lawyers Association submitted.
November 23, 2022 Amicus brief of American College of Tax Counsel submitted.
November 23, 2022 Amicus brief of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, Association of Corporate Counsel, and Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association submitted.
November 23, 2022 Amicus brief of Federation of Defense & Corporate Counsel submitted.
November 23, 2022 Amicus brief of American Bar Association submitted.
November 23, 2022 Amicus brief of The Buckeye Institute submitted.
November 22, 2022 Brief amicus curiae of Silicon Valley Tax Directors Group filed.
November 22, 2022 Brief amicus curiae of Washington Legal Foundation filed.
November 23, 2022 Brief amicus curiae of DRI Center for Law and Public Policy filed.
November 23, 2022 Brief amicus curiae of The Buckeye Institute filed.
November 23, 2022 Brief amici curiae of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, et al. filed.
November 23, 2022 Brief amicus curiae of Atlantic Legal Foundation filed.
November 23, 2022 Brief amicus curiae of California Lawyers Association filed.
November 23, 2022 Brief amicus curiae of American College of Tax Counsel filed.
November 23, 2022 Brief amicus curiae of Federation of Defense & Corporate Counsel filed.
November 23, 2022 Brief amicus curiae of American Bar Association filed.
November 23, 2022 Brief amicus curiae of Lawyers for Civil Justice filed.
November 16, 2022 Motion for leave to file the joint appendix under seal filed by petitioner.
December 7, 2022 CIRCULATION
December 7, 2022 Record received from the U.S.C.A. 9th Circuit. The record is electronic and contains sealed materials.
December 12, 2022 Motion for leave to file the joint appendix under seal GRANTED.
December 16, 2022 Brief of United States submitted.
December 16, 2022 Brief of respondent United States filed. (Distributed)
December 30, 2022 Reply of petitioner In Re Grand Jury filed. (Distributed)
January 9, 2023 Argued. For petitioner: Daniel B. Levin, Los Angeles, Cal. For respondent: Masha G. Hansford, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C.
Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.