Stairs v. Peaslee,
59 U.S. 521 (1855)

Annotate this Case
  • Syllabus  | 
  • Case

U.S. Supreme Court

Stairs v. Peaslee, 59 U.S. 18 How. 521 521 (1855)

Stairs v. Peaslee

59 U.S. (18 How.) 521


The Tariff Act of March 3, 1851, 9 Stat. 629, repealed so much of the former laws as provided that merchandise, when imported from a country other than that of production or manufacture, should be appraised at the market value of similar articles at the principal markets of the country of production or manufacture at the period of the exportation to the United States.

Page 59 U. S. 522

It must be appraised according to the value of the goods in the principal markets of the country from which they are exported.

Therefore, cutch, which is a product of the East Indies only, and the great market for which there is Calcutta, must he appraised not according to its value there, but at London and Liverpool, which are the principal markets of Great Britain, exclusive of India, and not at Halifax, from which place it was brought into the United States.

The word "country," mentioned above, embraces all the possessions of a foreign state, however widely separated, which are subject to the same supreme executive and legislative control.

It is for the merchant appraisers to decide what markets in these dominions are the principal ones for the goods in question, and their decision is final.

The penal duty of twenty percentum exacted by the 8th section of the Tariff Act of July 30, 1846, 9 Stat. 43, is properly levied upon goods entered at their invoice value if it is found to be ten percent below the dutiable value, as well as those goods where the importer makes an addition to the invoice value.

The case of Bartlett v. Kane, 16 How. 263, commented upon.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

Page 59 U. S. 524

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.