United States v. One Case of Clocks, 58 U.S. 99 (1854)

U.S. Supreme Court

United States v. One Case of Clocks, 58 U.S. 17 How. 99 99 (1854)

United States v. One Case of Clocks

58 U.S. (17 How.) 99

Syllabus

The decision in the three preceding cases again affirmed.

This case was similar in its circumstances to the case of United States v. Sixty-Seven Packages of Dry Goods.

U.S. Supreme Court

United States v. One Case of Clocks, 58 U.S. 17 How. 99 99 (1854)

United States v. One Case of Clocks

58 U.S. (17 How.) 99

ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED

STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Syllabus

The decision in the three preceding cases again affirmed.

This case was similar in its circumstances to the case of United States v. Sixty-Seven Packages of Dry Goods.

MR. JUSTICE NELSON delivered the opinion of the Court.

This is a libel of information for the condemnation and forfeiture of one case of clocks, for entry of goods upon an invoice, in which the goods were invoiced at a sum less than the actual cost value at the place of exportation, with a design to evade the duties.

The jury found a verdict for the plaintiff, upon which a judgment was rendered, but afterwards the court arrested and set aside the judgment and gave judgment for the claimants dismissing the libel, which was affirmed on error in the circuit court.

For the reasons give in the case of United States v. Sixty-Seven Packages of Dry Goods, the judgment of the court below must be

Reversed and the record remitted for further proceedings in conformity to the opinion of this Court.

MR. JUSTICE CAMPBELL dissented.

Order

This cause came on to be heard on the transcript of the record from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Louisiana, and was argued by counsel. On consideration whereof, it is now here ordered and adjudged by this Court that the judgment of the said circuit court in this cause be and the same is hereby remanded to the said circuit court for further proceedings to be had therein in conformity to the opinion of this Court.

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.