Friedrichs v. California Teachers Assn., 578 U.S. ___ (2016)

Justia Opinion Summary and Annotations

Annotation

Primary Holding

[There was no holding because an eight-member court was equally divided on the issue, allowing the decision of the lower court to stand.]

NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the preliminary print of the United States Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of the United States, Washington, D. C. 20543, of any typographical or other formal errors, in order that corrections may be made before the preliminary print goes to press.

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

_________________

No. 14–915

_________________

REBECCA FRIEDRICHS, et al., PETITIONERS v. CALIFORNIA TEACHERS ASSOCIATION, et al.

on writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the ninth circuit

[March 29, 2016]

Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.