Saltmarsh v. Tuthill,
54 U.S. 229 (1851)

Annotate this Case
  • Syllabus  | 
  • Case

U.S. Supreme Court

Saltmarsh v. Tuthill, 54 U.S. 13 How. 229 229 (1851)

Saltmarsh v. Tuthill

54 U.S. (13 How.) 229


In a suit by the endorsee against the endorser of a bill, where the defense was usury, the drawer and drawee were incompetent witnesses when offered to prove certain facts which, when taken in conjunction with certain other facts, to be proved by other witnesses, would invalidate the instrument.

Being incompetent witnesses to establish the whole defense, they are also incompetent to establish a part.

The only question was one of evidence, which is fully explained in the opinion of the court.

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.