Gibson v. Florida Bar, 502 U.S. 104 (1991)

OCTOBER TERM, 1991

Per Curiam

GIBSON v. FLORIDA BAR ET AL.

CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

No. 90-1102. Argued November 6, 1991-Decided December 4, 1991 Certiorari dismissed. Reported below: 906 F.2d 624.

Raymond J. Lajeunesse, Jr., argued the cause for peti­ tioner. With him on the briefs were Hugh L. Reilly and Herbert R. Kraft.

Barry Richard argued the cause and filed briefs for respondents. *

PER CURIAM.

The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted.

* Anthony T. Caso and Ronald A. Zumbrun filed a brief for the Pacific Legal Foundation as amicus curiae urging reversal.

Briefs of amici curiae were filed for the National Education Association et al. by Robert H. Chanin, Bruce R. Lerner, and Jeremiah A. Collins; for the State Bar of Wisconsin by John S. Skilton and William M. Conley; and for David P. Frankel et al. by Mr. Frankel, pro se, and Joseph W Little.


Full Text of Opinion

OCTOBER TERM, 1991

Per Curiam

GIBSON v. FLORIDA BAR ET AL.

CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

No. 90-1102. Argued November 6, 1991-Decided December 4, 1991 Certiorari dismissed. Reported below: 906 F.2d 624.

Raymond J. Lajeunesse, Jr., argued the cause for peti­ tioner. With him on the briefs were Hugh L. Reilly and Herbert R. Kraft.

Barry Richard argued the cause and filed briefs for respondents. *

PER CURIAM.

The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted.

* Anthony T. Caso and Ronald A. Zumbrun filed a brief for the Pacific Legal Foundation as amicus curiae urging reversal.

Briefs of amici curiae were filed for the National Education Association et al. by Robert H. Chanin, Bruce R. Lerner, and Jeremiah A. Collins; for the State Bar of Wisconsin by John S. Skilton and William M. Conley; and for David P. Frankel et al. by Mr. Frankel, pro se, and Joseph W Little.

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.