WALTER FLEISHER CO., INC. v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, 449 U.S. 608 (1981)

U.S. Supreme Court

WALTER FLEISHER CO., INC. v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, 449 U.S. 608 (1981)

449 U.S. 608

WALTER FLEISHER CO., INC. v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

No. 79-700.

Argued November 4, 1980
Decided January 26, 1981

Affirmed by an equally divided Court.

Gerald T. Manpearl argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner.

Philip H. Hickok argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief were John H. Larson and DeWitt W. Clinton.*

[Footnote *] Joanne M. Garvey, Michael Wells, and Roy E. Crawford filed a brief for the Committee on Unitary Tax as amicus curiae.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.

JUSTICE STEWART took no part in the decision of this case.

Page 449 U.S. 608, 609




U.S. Supreme Court

WALTER FLEISHER CO., INC. v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, 449 U.S. 608 (1981)

449 U.S. 608

WALTER FLEISHER CO., INC. v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

No. 79-700.

Argued November 4, 1980
Decided January 26, 1981

Affirmed by an equally divided Court.

Gerald T. Manpearl argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner.

Philip H. Hickok argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief were John H. Larson and DeWitt W. Clinton.*

[Footnote *] Joanne M. Garvey, Michael Wells, and Roy E. Crawford filed a brief for the Committee on Unitary Tax as amicus curiae.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.

JUSTICE STEWART took no part in the decision of this case.

Page 449 U.S. 608, 609

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.