VORCHHEIMER v. SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PHILADELPHIA, 430 U.S. 703 (1977)

U.S. Supreme Court

VORCHHEIMER v. SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PHILADELPHIA, 430 U.S. 703 (1977)

430 U.S. 703

VORCHHEIMER v. SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PHILADELPHIA ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

No. 76-37.

Argued February 22, 1977
Decided April 19, 1977

532 F.2d 880, affirmed by an equally divided Court.

Sharon K. Wallis argued the cause for petitioner. With her on the briefs were Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Melvin L. Wulf.

Alan H. Gilbert argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief was Edward B. Soken.*

[Footnote *] Solicitor General Bork filed a brief for the United States as amicus curiae.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.

MR. JUSTICE REHNQUIST took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 430 U.S. 703, 704




U.S. Supreme Court

VORCHHEIMER v. SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PHILADELPHIA, 430 U.S. 703 (1977)

430 U.S. 703

VORCHHEIMER v. SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PHILADELPHIA ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

No. 76-37.

Argued February 22, 1977
Decided April 19, 1977

532 F.2d 880, affirmed by an equally divided Court.

Sharon K. Wallis argued the cause for petitioner. With her on the briefs were Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Melvin L. Wulf.

Alan H. Gilbert argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief was Edward B. Soken.*

[Footnote *] Solicitor General Bork filed a brief for the United States as amicus curiae.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.

MR. JUSTICE REHNQUIST took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 430 U.S. 703, 704

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.