MISSISSIPPI v. ARKANSAS, 415 U.S. 302 (1974)
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
MISSISSIPPI v. ARKANSAS, 415 U.S. 302 (1974) 415 U.S. 302MISSISSIPPI v. ARKANSAS.
No. 48.
Orig. Decided February 26, 1974. Decree entered February 26,
1974.
Opinion reported: Ante, p. 289.
DECREEIT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED AS FOLLOWS:
1. Luna Bar, depicted in Mississippi's Exhibits 1 and 2, constituting, respectively, Appendix A and part of Appendix B to the Special Master's report, and appended hereto and hereby made a part of this decree, came into existence by accretion to Carter Point and is, and was, a part of the State of Mississippi.
2. The boundary line between the State of Mississippi and the State of Arkansas in the areas between the upstream and the downstream ends of Tarpley Cut-off is as follows:
In the abandoned bed of the
Mississippi River between the upstream end of the Tarpley Cut-off
and the downstream end of Tarpley Cut-off, as defined and
identified in Mississippi's said Exhibit 2. The courses and
distances of the above-described line are set out in said Exhibit
2.
3. The cost of this suit, including the expenses of
the Special Master and the printing of his report, have been paid
out of the fund made up of equal contributions by the State of
Mississippi and the State of Arkansas and said fund has been
sufficient to defray all said expenses to the date of the issuance
of the report. Any costs and expenses that may be incurred beyond
the amount so contributed by the respective litigants shall be
borne by the State of Arkansas.
Opinions
No. 48.
Orig. Decided February 26, 1974. Decree entered February 26, 1974. Opinion reported: Ante, p. 289. DECREE IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED AS FOLLOWS: 1. Luna Bar, depicted in Mississippi's Exhibits 1 and 2, constituting, respectively, Appendix A and part of Appendix B to the Special Master's report, and appended hereto and hereby made a part of this decree, came into existence by accretion to Carter Point and is, and was, a part of the State of Mississippi. 2. The boundary line between the State of Mississippi and the State of Arkansas in the areas between the upstream and the downstream ends of Tarpley Cut-off is as follows:
U.S. Supreme Court
MISSISSIPPI v. ARKANSAS, 415 U.S. 302 (1974) 415 U.S. 302 MISSISSIPPI v. ARKANSAS.No. 48.
Orig. Decided February 26, 1974. Decree entered February 26, 1974. Opinion reported: Ante, p. 289. DECREE IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED AS FOLLOWS: 1. Luna Bar, depicted in Mississippi's Exhibits 1 and 2, constituting, respectively, Appendix A and part of Appendix B to the Special Master's report, and appended hereto and hereby made a part of this decree, came into existence by accretion to Carter Point and is, and was, a part of the State of Mississippi. 2. The boundary line between the State of Mississippi and the State of Arkansas in the areas between the upstream and the downstream ends of Tarpley Cut-off is as follows:
In the abandoned bed of the
Mississippi River between the upstream end of the Tarpley Cut-off
and the downstream end of Tarpley Cut-off, as defined and
identified in Mississippi's said Exhibit 2. The courses and
distances of the above-described line are set out in said Exhibit
2.
3. The cost of this suit, including the expenses of
the Special Master and the printing of his report, have been paid
out of the fund made up of equal contributions by the State of
Mississippi and the State of Arkansas and said fund has been
sufficient to defray all said expenses to the date of the issuance
of the report. Any costs and expenses that may be incurred beyond
the amount so contributed by the respective litigants shall be
borne by the State of Arkansas.
Search This Case
