COM. OF PENNSYLVANIA v. LYON, 4 U.S. 302 (1804)
U.S. Supreme Court
COM. OF PENNSYLVANIA v. LYON, 4 U.S. 302 (1804)4 U.S. 302 (Dall.)
Commonwealth
v.
Lyon.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
March Term, 1804
THE defendant, having made an affidavit in the usual form, applied to SMITH, Justice, for the allowance of a certiorari to remove this indictment from the Quarter Sessions of Northumberland county, into the Circuit Court.
Cooper (acting for the attorney-general) stated the reasons, which had induced him to decline consenting to the removal; and the following authorities were mentioned. The removal of an indictment, at the instance of the defendant, is discretionary with the Court; but the discretion ought not to be exercised, without special cause. 2 Hawk. 407, 8. s. 27. 4 Burr. 2458. The removal is not usually allowed in cases of perjury, forgery, &c. because such offences should be discouraged; and removals not only tend to delay justice, but to discountenance prosecutions. Ibid. 408. s. 28. The act of assembly contemplates the same principle; for, if the attorney-general does not consent to the removal, writs of certiorari are only to be specially allowed, and certified in writing upon the writ, by the Supreme Court, or one of its judges, upon sufficient cause shown. 3 State Laws, 92. Dall. edit.
SMITH, Justice.
It is not the practice to enter into an argument upon applications of this nature. The defendant has made the usual oath, as a ground for allowing the certiorari; and I shall, of course, allow it, unless something is shown, in relation to his character and conduct, which will induce me to suppose, that public justice is likely to be impaired, or defeated, by the removal.
Cooper declaring that the defendant's character was good,
independent of its implication in the present charge; the Judge
immediately signed the allocatur.
U.S. Supreme Court
COM. OF PENNSYLVANIA v. LYON, 4 U.S. 302 (1804) 4 U.S. 302 (Dall.) Commonwealthv.
Lyon. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. March Term, 1804 THE defendant, having made an affidavit in the usual form, applied to SMITH, Justice, for the allowance of a certiorari to remove this indictment from the Quarter Sessions of Northumberland county, into the Circuit Court. Cooper (acting for the attorney-general) stated the reasons, which had induced him to decline consenting to the removal; and the following authorities were mentioned. The removal of an indictment, at the instance of the defendant, is discretionary with the Court; but the discretion ought not to be exercised, without special cause. 2 Hawk. 407, 8. s. 27. 4 Burr. 2458. The removal is not usually allowed in cases of perjury, forgery, &c. because such offences should be discouraged; and removals not only tend to delay justice, but to discountenance prosecutions. Ibid. 408. s. 28. The act of assembly contemplates the same principle; for, if the attorney-general does not consent to the removal, writs of certiorari are only to be specially allowed, and certified in writing upon the writ, by the Supreme Court, or one of its judges, upon sufficient cause shown. 3 State Laws, 92. Dall. edit. SMITH, Justice. It is not the practice to enter into an argument upon applications of this nature. The defendant has made the usual oath, as a ground for allowing the certiorari; and I shall, of course, allow it, unless something is shown, in relation to his character and conduct, which will induce me to suppose, that public justice is likely to be impaired, or defeated, by the removal. Cooper declaring that the defendant's character was good, independent of its implication in the present charge; the Judge immediately signed the allocatur.
