HOCKER v. HEFFLEY, 399 U.S. 521 (1970)
U.S. Supreme Court
HOCKER v. HEFFLEY, 399 U.S. 521 (1970) 399 U.S. 521HOCKER, WARDEN v. HEFFLEY
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT
OF
APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT No. 1195.
Decided June 29, 1970
Certiorari granted; 420 F.2d 881, vacated and remanded.
PER CURIAM.
The motion of the respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for further consideration in light of Chambers v. Maroney, ante, p. 42.
MR. JUSTICE HARLAN is of the opinion that certiorari should be denied. However, the case having been taken for review, he would affirm the judgment below for the reasons stated in his separate opinion in Chambers v. Maroney, ante, p. 55.
U.S. Supreme Court
HOCKER v. HEFFLEY, 399 U.S. 521 (1970) 399 U.S. 521 HOCKER, WARDEN v. HEFFLEYON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF
APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT No. 1195.
Decided June 29, 1970
Certiorari granted; 420 F.2d 881, vacated and remanded. PER CURIAM. The motion of the respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for further consideration in light of Chambers v. Maroney, ante, p. 42. MR. JUSTICE HARLAN is of the opinion that certiorari should be denied. However, the case having been taken for review, he would affirm the judgment below for the reasons stated in his separate opinion in Chambers v. Maroney, ante, p. 55. Page 399 U.S. 521, 522
