GARDEN STATE TRANSIT CO., INC. v. UNITED STATES, 397 U.S. 661 (1970)
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court Reports
GARDEN STATE TRANSIT CO., INC. v. UNITED STATES, 397 U.S. 661 (1970) 397 U.S. 661GARDEN STATE TRANSIT CO., INC. v.
UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF
NEW JERSEY
No. 1323.
Decided April 27, 1970
Affirmed.
Herman B. J. Weckstein for appellant.
Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General McLaren, Robert W. Ginnane, Fritz R. Kahn, and Raymond M. Zimmet for the United States et al.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.
Opinions
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
No. 1323.
Decided April 27, 1970
Affirmed. Herman B. J. Weckstein for appellant. Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General McLaren, Robert W. Ginnane, Fritz R. Kahn, and Raymond M. Zimmet for the United States et al. PER CURIAM. The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. Page 397 U.S. 661, 662
U.S. Supreme Court Reports
GARDEN STATE TRANSIT CO., INC. v. UNITED STATES, 397 U.S. 661 (1970) 397 U.S. 661 (1970) 397 U.S. 661 397 U.S. 661"> GARDEN STATE TRANSIT CO., INC. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
No. 1323.
Decided April 27, 1970
Affirmed. Herman B. J. Weckstein for appellant. Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General McLaren, Robert W. Ginnane, Fritz R. Kahn, and Raymond M. Zimmet for the United States et al. PER CURIAM. The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. Page 397 U.S. 661, 662
Search This Case
