SPARTAN'S INDUSTRIES v. TEXAS, 397 U.S. 590 (1970)
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court Reports
SPARTAN'S INDUSTRIES v. TEXAS, 397 U.S. 590 (1970) 397 U.S. 590SPARTAN'S INDUSTRIES, INC., ET AL. v.
TEXAS
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS
No. 1255.
Decided April 20, 1970
447 S.W.2d 407, appeal dismissed.
William H. Allen, William H. Bloch, George A. Kampmann, Oscar Spitz, Harold B. Berman, and Jay S. Fichtner for appellants.
Crawford C. Martin, Attorney General of Texas, Nola White, First Assistant Attorney General, Alfred Walker, Executive Assistant Attorney General, and Robert C. Flowers and Monroe Clayton, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Opinions
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS
No. 1255.
Decided April 20, 1970
447 S.W.2d 407, appeal dismissed. William H. Allen, William H. Bloch, George A. Kampmann, Oscar Spitz, Harold B. Berman, and Jay S. Fichtner for appellants. Crawford C. Martin, Attorney General of Texas, Nola White, First Assistant Attorney General, Alfred Walker, Executive Assistant Attorney General, and Robert C. Flowers and Monroe Clayton, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee. PER CURIAM. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Page 397 U.S. 590, 591
U.S. Supreme Court Reports
SPARTAN'S INDUSTRIES v. TEXAS, 397 U.S. 590 (1970) 397 U.S. 590 (1970) 397 U.S. 590 397 U.S. 590"> SPARTAN'S INDUSTRIES, INC., ET AL. v. TEXASAPPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS
No. 1255.
Decided April 20, 1970
447 S.W.2d 407, appeal dismissed. William H. Allen, William H. Bloch, George A. Kampmann, Oscar Spitz, Harold B. Berman, and Jay S. Fichtner for appellants. Crawford C. Martin, Attorney General of Texas, Nola White, First Assistant Attorney General, Alfred Walker, Executive Assistant Attorney General, and Robert C. Flowers and Monroe Clayton, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee. PER CURIAM. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Page 397 U.S. 590, 591
Search This Case
