ASSOCIATED TRUCK LINES, INC., v. UNITED STATES, 397 U.S. 42 (1970)
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
ASSOCIATED TRUCK LINES, INC., v. UNITED STATES, 397 U.S. 42 (1970) 397 U.S. 42ASSOCIATED TRUCK LINES, INC., ET AL. v.
UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR
THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN. No. 997.
Decided February 24, 1970
304 F. Supp. 1094, affirmed.
Conrad A. Bradshaw, Peter T. Beardsley, R. Edwin Brady, Albert B. Rosenbaum, Roland Rice, and Richard R. Sigmon for appellants.
Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General McLaren, Howard E. Shapiro, Robert W. Ginnane, and Fritz R. Kahn for the United States et al., and Edward A. McCabe for National Furniture Traffic Conference, Inc., appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.
Opinions
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR
THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN. No. 997.
Decided February 24, 1970
304 F. Supp. 1094, affirmed. Conrad A. Bradshaw, Peter T. Beardsley, R. Edwin Brady, Albert B. Rosenbaum, Roland Rice, and Richard R. Sigmon for appellants. Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General McLaren, Howard E. Shapiro, Robert W. Ginnane, and Fritz R. Kahn for the United States et al., and Edward A. McCabe for National Furniture Traffic Conference, Inc., appellees. PER CURIAM. The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.
U.S. Supreme Court
ASSOCIATED TRUCK LINES, INC., v. UNITED STATES, 397 U.S. 42 (1970) 397 U.S. 42 ASSOCIATED TRUCK LINES, INC., ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR
THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN. No. 997.
Decided February 24, 1970
304 F. Supp. 1094, affirmed. Conrad A. Bradshaw, Peter T. Beardsley, R. Edwin Brady, Albert B. Rosenbaum, Roland Rice, and Richard R. Sigmon for appellants. Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General McLaren, Howard E. Shapiro, Robert W. Ginnane, and Fritz R. Kahn for the United States et al., and Edward A. McCabe for National Furniture Traffic Conference, Inc., appellees. PER CURIAM. The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.
Search This Case
