PRE-FAB TRANSIT CO. v. UNITED STATES, 397 U.S. 40 (1970)
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
PRE-FAB TRANSIT CO. v. UNITED STATES, 397 U.S. 40 (1970) 397 U.S. 40PRE-FAB TRANSIT CO. v. UNITED STATES ET
AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR
THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. No. 988.
Decided February 24, 1970
306 F. Supp. 1247, affirmed.
Edward K. Wheeler, Robert G. Seaks, and Robert E. Joyner for appellant.
Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General McLaren, Howard E. Shapiro, Robert W. Ginnane, Fritz R. Kahn, and Nahum Litt for the United States et al., Martin J. Leavitt for Miami Transportation Co., Inc., et al., and James E. Wilson and Edward G. Villalon for Hennis Freight Lines, Inc., appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.
Opinions
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR
THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. No. 988.
Decided February 24, 1970
306 F. Supp. 1247, affirmed. Edward K. Wheeler, Robert G. Seaks, and Robert E. Joyner for appellant. Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General McLaren, Howard E. Shapiro, Robert W. Ginnane, Fritz R. Kahn, and Nahum Litt for the United States et al., Martin J. Leavitt for Miami Transportation Co., Inc., et al., and James E. Wilson and Edward G. Villalon for Hennis Freight Lines, Inc., appellees. PER CURIAM. The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.
U.S. Supreme Court
PRE-FAB TRANSIT CO. v. UNITED STATES, 397 U.S. 40 (1970) 397 U.S. 40 PRE-FAB TRANSIT CO. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR
THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. No. 988.
Decided February 24, 1970
306 F. Supp. 1247, affirmed. Edward K. Wheeler, Robert G. Seaks, and Robert E. Joyner for appellant. Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General McLaren, Howard E. Shapiro, Robert W. Ginnane, Fritz R. Kahn, and Nahum Litt for the United States et al., Martin J. Leavitt for Miami Transportation Co., Inc., et al., and James E. Wilson and Edward G. Villalon for Hennis Freight Lines, Inc., appellees. PER CURIAM. The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.
Search This Case
