FRIEDMAN v. NEW YORK, 397 U.S. 317 (1970)
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
FRIEDMAN v. NEW YORK, 397 U.S. 317 (1970) 397 U.S. 317FRIEDMAN v. NEW YORK
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK
No. 1137.
Decided March 23, 1970
24 N.Y.2d 528, 249 N.E.2d 369, appeal dismissed.
Marx Leva, Alexander B. Hawes, and Richard E. Nolan for appellant.
Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, Ruth Kessler Toch, Solicitor General, and Jeremiah Jochnowitz, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Opinions
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK
No. 1137.
Decided March 23, 1970
24 N.Y.2d 528, 249 N.E.2d 369, appeal dismissed. Marx Leva, Alexander B. Hawes, and Richard E. Nolan for appellant. Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, Ruth Kessler Toch, Solicitor General, and Jeremiah Jochnowitz, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee. PER CURIAM. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
U.S. Supreme Court
FRIEDMAN v. NEW YORK, 397 U.S. 317 (1970) 397 U.S. 317 FRIEDMAN v. NEW YORKAPPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK
No. 1137.
Decided March 23, 1970
24 N.Y.2d 528, 249 N.E.2d 369, appeal dismissed. Marx Leva, Alexander B. Hawes, and Richard E. Nolan for appellant. Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, Ruth Kessler Toch, Solicitor General, and Jeremiah Jochnowitz, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee. PER CURIAM. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Search This Case
