FIRST FEDERAL SAV. & LOAN A., PROVIDENCE v. LANGTON, 396 U.S. 374 (1970)
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
FIRST FEDERAL SAV. & LOAN A., PROVIDENCE v. LANGTON, 396 U.S. 374 (1970) 396 U.S. 374FIRST FEDERAL SAVINGS & LOAN
ASSOCIATION OF PROVIDENCE v. LANGTON, TAX
ADMINISTRATOR
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF RHODE ISLAND No. 288.
Decided January 19, 1970
___ R. I. ___, 251 A.2d 170, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.
Max Winograd for appellant.
Herbert F. De Simone, Attorney General of Rhode Island, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.
Opinions
ADMINISTRATOR
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF RHODE ISLAND No. 288.
Decided January 19, 1970
___ R. I. ___, 251 A.2d 170, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied. Max Winograd for appellant. Herbert F. De Simone, Attorney General of Rhode Island, for appellee. PER CURIAM. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted. Page 396 U.S. 374, 375
U.S. Supreme Court
FIRST FEDERAL SAV. & LOAN A., PROVIDENCE v. LANGTON, 396 U.S. 374 (1970) 396 U.S. 374 FIRST FEDERAL SAVINGS & LOAN ASSOCIATION OF PROVIDENCE v. LANGTON, TAXADMINISTRATOR
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF RHODE ISLAND No. 288.
Decided January 19, 1970
___ R. I. ___, 251 A.2d 170, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied. Max Winograd for appellant. Herbert F. De Simone, Attorney General of Rhode Island, for appellee. PER CURIAM. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted. Page 396 U.S. 374, 375
Search This Case
