The District Court approved a school board's desegregation
proposal to revise school boundaries effective at the start of the
school year and ordered the board to submit a complete
desegregation plan within two months thereafter. Intervenors
appealed with respect to the boundary provision and sought a stay
of its effectuation. The Court of Appeals summarily vacated the
District Court's order as inappropriate except as part of an
overall plan.
Held: The Court of Appeals should have allowed the
implementation of the proposal, as to which petitioners did not
object, pending argument and decision of the appeal.
Alexander
v. Holmes County Board, ante, p.
396 U. S. 19.
Certiorari granted; vacated and remanded.
PER CURIAM.
In this school desegregation case, the District Court for the
Western District of Oklahoma, by order entered August 1, 1969,
approved respondent Oklahoma City School Board's proposal for
furthering desegregation of some Oklahoma City schools by revising
school attendance
Page 396 U. S. 270
boundaries effective September 2, 1969, the start of the
1969-1970 school year. The order also decreed that the School Board
prepare and submit on or before November 1, 1969, a comprehensive
plan for the complete desegregation of the entire school system.
Intervenors of the "McWilliams Class" appealed to the Court of
Appeals for the Tenth Circuit from the provision of the order which
approved implementation of the School Board's proposed boundary
changes by September 2, 1969, and sought a stay of that provision
pending decision of the appeal. The Court of Appeals, on August 27,
1969, instead of limiting relief to the requested stay, summarily
vacated the District Court's approval of the School Board's
proposal. The Court of Appeals held that consideration of the
proposal was inappropriate "at this stage of the proceedings" and
should await the District Court's
"consideration and adoption of a full and comprehensive plan for
the complete desegregation and integration of the Oklahoma City
School system as contemplated in the court's order of August 13,
1969."
The petition for certiorari is granted. [
Footnote 1] The Court of Appeals erred in holding that
the District Court's approval of the School Board's plan must be
vacated because consideration of the proposal was inappropriate
except in the context of a comprehensive city-wide plan. The burden
on a school board is to desegregate an unconstitutional dual system
at once.
Green v. County School Board, 391 U.
S. 430,
391 U. S. 439
(1968);
Alexander v. Holmes County Board of Education,
ante, p.
396 U. S. 19.
Since
Page 396 U. S. 271
the District Court ordered the desegregation measures into
effect, and since the petitioners did not object to their scope,
the Court of Appeals should have permitted their implementation
pending argument and decision of the appeal.
Alexander v.
Holmes County Board of Education, supra. The order of the
Court of Appeals is therefore vacated, and the case is remanded to
that court promptly to hear and determine, consistently with
Alexander, all pending appeals from the District Court
order. [
Footnote 2]
It is so ordered.
[
Footnote 1]
The petition was filed pursuant to an expedited schedule
specified by MR JUSTICE BRENNAN when, on petitioners application,
he, as Acting Circuit Justice, vacated the order of the Court of
Appeals and reinstated that of the District Court, pending action
by this Court on the petition.
[
Footnote 2]
We are informed by the parties that the School Board on
September 12, 1969, also filed an appeal from the District Court's
approval of the Board's proposal, and another appeal from the
District Court's denial on September 11, 1969, of the Board's
application for amendment of the August 13 order to extend from
November 1, 1969, to March 31, 1970, the time for filing of a
comprehensive desegregation plan for secondary schools. The
District Court granted the Board's application as to a plan for
desegregation of the elementary schools.