HOUSE OF SEAGRAM v. STATE LIQUOR AUTHORITY, 396 U.S. 121 (1969)
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
HOUSE OF SEAGRAM v. STATE LIQUOR AUTHORITY, 396 U.S. 121 (1969) 396 U.S. 121HOUSE OF SEAGRAM, INC. v. STATE LIQUOR
AUTHORITY ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK
No. 563.
Decided December 8, 1969
25 N.Y.2d 865, 250 N.E.2d 873, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.
H. Gardner Ingraham and Emanuel Becker for appellant.
Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, Ruth Kessler Toch, Solicitor General, and Grace K. Banoff for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.
Opinions
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK
No. 563.
Decided December 8, 1969
25 N.Y.2d 865, 250 N.E.2d 873, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied. H. Gardner Ingraham and Emanuel Becker for appellant. Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, Ruth Kessler Toch, Solicitor General, and Grace K. Banoff for appellees. PER CURIAM. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted. Page 396 U.S. 121, 122
U.S. Supreme Court
HOUSE OF SEAGRAM v. STATE LIQUOR AUTHORITY, 396 U.S. 121 (1969) 396 U.S. 121 HOUSE OF SEAGRAM, INC. v. STATE LIQUOR AUTHORITY ET AL.APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK
No. 563.
Decided December 8, 1969
25 N.Y.2d 865, 250 N.E.2d 873, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied. H. Gardner Ingraham and Emanuel Becker for appellant. Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, Ruth Kessler Toch, Solicitor General, and Grace K. Banoff for appellees. PER CURIAM. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted. Page 396 U.S. 121, 122
Search This Case
